Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
Cc: Linux NFS mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	trond.myklebust@netapp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs(5): document new local_lock option
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:16:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CA32000.8040906@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C9BA266.1040102@suse.de>



On 09/23/2010 02:54 PM, Suresh Jayaraman wrote:
> Kernel 2.6.37 would most likely add a new mount option: local_lock.
> Document the new option in the nfs(5) man page.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
Committed...

steved.

> ---
>  utils/mount/nfs.man |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/utils/mount/nfs.man b/utils/mount/nfs.man
> index 55d4b55..d2a4c5f 100644
> --- a/utils/mount/nfs.man
> +++ b/utils/mount/nfs.man
> @@ -717,6 +717,50 @@ If this option is not specified, the NFS client uses READDIRPLUS requests
>  on NFS version 3 mounts to read small directories.
>  Some applications perform better if the client uses only READDIR requests
>  for all directories.
> +.TP 1.5i
> +.BR local_lock= mechanism
> +Specifies whether to use local locking for any or both of the flock and the
> +POSIX locking mechanisms.
> +.I mechanism
> +can be one of
> +.BR all ,
> +.BR flock ,
> +.BR posix ,
> +or
> +.BR none .
> +This option is supported in kernels 2.6.37 and later.
> +.IP
> +The Linux NFS client provides a way to make locks local. This means, the
> +applications can lock files, but such locks provide exclusion only against
> +other applications running on the same client. Remote applications are not
> +affected by these locks.
> +.IP
> +If this option is not specified, or if
> +.B none
> +is specified, the client assumes that the locks are not local.
> +.IP
> +If
> +.BR all
> +is specified, the client assumes that both flock and POSIX locks are local.
> +.IP
> +If
> +.BR flock
> +is specified, the client assumes that only flock locks are local and uses
> +NLM sideband protocol to lock files when POSIX locks are used.
> +.IP
> +If
> +.BR posix
> +is specified, the client assumes that POSIX locks are local and uses NLM
> +sideband protocol to lock files when flock locks are used.
> +.IP
> +To support legacy flock behavior similar to that of NFS clients < 2.6.12, use
> +'local_lock=flock'. This option is required when exporting NFS mounts via
> +Samba as Samba maps Windows share mode locks as flock. Since NFS clients >
> +2.6.12 implement flock by emulating POSIX locks, this will result in
> +conflicting locks.
> +.IP
> +NOTE: When used together, the 'local_lock' mount option will be overridden
> +by 'nolock'/'lock' mount option.
>  .SS "Options for version 4 only"
>  Use these options, along with the options in the first subsection above,
>  for NFSv4 only. They will be ignored with older versions.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-29 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-23 18:54 [PATCH] nfs(5): document new local_lock option Suresh Jayaraman
2010-09-29  4:12 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2010-09-29 11:08   ` Steve Dickson
2010-09-29 11:12     ` Steve Dickson
2010-09-29 11:16 ` Steve Dickson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CA32000.8040906@RedHat.com \
    --to=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sjayaraman@suse.de \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox