From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nfsd4: adjust buflen for encoded attrs bitmap based on actual bitmap length
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:18:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CA5FBAB.2040309@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101001145018.GD17310@fieldses.org>
On 2010-10-01 16:50, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:47:46PM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> The existing code adjusted it based on the worst case scenario for the returned
>> bitmap and the best case scenario for the supported attrs attribute.
>
> Looks fine, thanks. Mind if I just ditch the unlikely()s? I know,
> they've been there for a while, but I'm just skeptical of their value on
> anything but the most unbelievably hot optimized-to-death code paths.
Well, they don't bother me so I don't the value of ditching them either :)
They're supposed to help branch prediction thus optimizing the common
code paths on the expense of the unlikely path but I too didn't measure
their affect.
Bottom line is that I don't have and strong reservations either for or
against them in this case :)
Benny
>
> --b.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
>> ---
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>> index 1a468bb..f48d891 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>> @@ -1805,19 +1805,23 @@ nfsd4_encode_fattr(struct svc_fh *fhp, struct svc_export *exp,
>> goto out_nfserr;
>> }
>> }
>> - if ((buflen -= 16) < 0)
>> - goto out_resource;
>>
>> if (unlikely(bmval2)) {
>> + if ((buflen -= 16) < 0)
>> + goto out_resource;
>> WRITE32(3);
>> WRITE32(bmval0);
>> WRITE32(bmval1);
>> WRITE32(bmval2);
>> } else if (likely(bmval1)) {
>> + if ((buflen -= 12) < 0)
>> + goto out_resource;
>> WRITE32(2);
>> WRITE32(bmval0);
>> WRITE32(bmval1);
>> } else {
>> + if ((buflen -= 8) < 0)
>> + goto out_resource;
>> WRITE32(1);
>> WRITE32(bmval0);
>> }
>> @@ -1828,15 +1832,17 @@ nfsd4_encode_fattr(struct svc_fh *fhp, struct svc_export *exp,
>> u32 word1 = nfsd_suppattrs1(minorversion);
>> u32 word2 = nfsd_suppattrs2(minorversion);
>>
>> - if ((buflen -= 12) < 0)
>> - goto out_resource;
>> if (!aclsupport)
>> word0 &= ~FATTR4_WORD0_ACL;
>> if (!word2) {
>> + if ((buflen -= 12) < 0)
>> + goto out_resource;
>> WRITE32(2);
>> WRITE32(word0);
>> WRITE32(word1);
>> } else {
>> + if ((buflen -= 16) < 0)
>> + goto out_resource;
>> WRITE32(3);
>> WRITE32(word0);
>> WRITE32(word1);
>> --
>> 1.7.2.3
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-01 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-30 18:47 [PATCH 1/2] nfsd4: adjust buflen for encoded attrs bitmap based on actual bitmap length Benny Halevy
2010-10-01 14:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-01 15:18 ` Benny Halevy [this message]
2010-10-01 22:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CA5FBAB.2040309@panasas.com \
--to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).