From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pnfs_submit: Restore forgetful mode io draining
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:04:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB4A332.8090803@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286444145-12781-1-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com>
On 2010-10-07 05:35, Fred Isaman wrote:
> Recent changes to the waitq code removed the wait for io to drain
> in the case of a "forgetful" return. Restore the previous behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 6 +++++-
> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 9 +++------
> include/linux/nfs_xdr.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index c854814..7727f592 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -5639,7 +5639,11 @@ nfs4_layoutreturn_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
> rpc_sleep_on(&nfsi->lo_rpcwaitq, task, NULL);
> return;
> }
> -
> + if (lrp->stateid) {
> + /* Forget the layout, without sending the return */
> + rpc_exit(task, 0);
> + return;
> + }
> if (nfs4_setup_sequence(server, NULL, &lrp->args.seq_args,
> &lrp->res.seq_res, 0, task))
> return;
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index f573219..eb4dfdf 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ pnfs_return_layout_barrier(struct nfs_inode *nfsi,
> static int
> return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
> enum pnfs_layoutreturn_type type, struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
> - bool wait)
> + bool wait, const nfs4_stateid *stateid)
> {
> struct nfs4_layoutreturn *lrp;
> struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(ino);
> @@ -633,6 +633,7 @@ return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
> lrp->args.return_type = type;
> lrp->args.range = *range;
> lrp->args.inode = ino;
> + lrp->stateid = stateid;
>
> status = nfs4_proc_layoutreturn(lrp, wait);
> out:
> @@ -688,11 +689,7 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
> __func__, status);
> }
> }
> -
> - if (!stateid)
> - status = return_layout(ino, &arg, type, lo, wait);
> - else
> - pnfs_layoutreturn_release(lo, &arg);
> + status = return_layout(ino, &arg, type, lo, wait, stateid);
> }
> out:
> dprintk("<-- %s status: %d\n", __func__, status);
> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
> index c72de21..80e6a36 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
> @@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ struct nfs4_layoutreturn {
> struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args args;
> struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res res;
> struct rpc_cred *cred;
> + const nfs4_stateid *stateid;
> int rpc_status;
> };
>
So after reverting this patch in post-submit there's no real reason
for passing the stateid to pnfs_return_layout, is it?
I'm planning to do the following in the pnfs branch (post revert of your patch):
git diff --stat -p -M
fs/nfs/callback_proc.c | 5 ++---
fs/nfs/inode.c | 2 +-
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 11 +----------
fs/nfs/pnfs.h | 5 +----
5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
index 6b560ce..93a9b2e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
@@ -234,8 +234,7 @@ static int pnfs_recall_layout(void *data)
if (pnfs_is_next_layout_stateid(NFS_I(inode)->layout,
rl.cbl_stateid))
status = pnfs_return_layout(inode, &rl.cbl_seg,
- &rl.cbl_stateid, RETURN_FILE,
- false);
+ RETURN_FILE, false);
else
status = cpu_to_be32(NFS4ERR_DELAY);
if (status)
@@ -255,7 +254,7 @@ static int pnfs_recall_layout(void *data)
/* IMPROVEME: This loop is inefficient, running in O(|s_inodes|^2) */
while ((ino = nfs_layoutrecall_find_inode(clp, &rl)) != NULL) {
/* FIXME: need to check status on pnfs_return_layout */
- pnfs_return_layout(ino, &rl.cbl_seg, NULL, RETURN_FILE, false);
+ pnfs_return_layout(ino, &rl.cbl_seg, RETURN_FILE, false);
iput(ino);
}
diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
index 437d9a6..cbd5b3f 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
@@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
*/
void nfs4_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
{
- pnfs_return_layout(inode, NULL, NULL, RETURN_FILE, true);
+ pnfs_return_layout(inode, NULL, RETURN_FILE, true);
truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
end_writeback(inode);
pnfs_destroy_layout(NFS_I(inode));
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
index 3168d77..8d32f2f 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static void __nfs4_close(struct path *path, struct nfs4_state *state,
.length = NFS4_MAX_UINT64,
};
- pnfs_return_layout(state->inode, &range, NULL,
+ pnfs_return_layout(state->inode, &range,
RETURN_FILE, wait);
}
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index f573219..74d8532 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -642,7 +642,6 @@ out:
int
_pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
- const nfs4_stateid *stateid, /* optional */
enum pnfs_layoutreturn_type type,
bool wait)
{
@@ -675,11 +674,6 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
if (layoutcommit_needed(nfsi)) {
- if (stateid && !wait) { /* callback */
- dprintk("%s: layoutcommit pending\n", __func__);
- status = -EAGAIN;
- goto out_put;
- }
status = pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(ino, wait);
if (status) {
/* Return layout even if layoutcommit fails */
@@ -689,10 +683,7 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
}
}
- if (!stateid)
- status = return_layout(ino, &arg, type, lo, wait);
- else
- pnfs_layoutreturn_release(lo, &arg);
+ status = return_layout(ino, &arg, type, lo, wait);
}
out:
dprintk("<-- %s status: %d\n", __func__, status);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
index 235709e..7ca22a0 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
@@ -184,7 +184,6 @@ pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino, struct nfs_open_context *ctx,
enum pnfs_iomode access_type);
bool pnfs_return_layout_barrier(struct nfs_inode *, struct pnfs_layout_range *);
int _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *, struct pnfs_layout_range *,
- const nfs4_stateid *stateid, /* optional */
enum pnfs_layoutreturn_type, bool wait);
void set_pnfs_layoutdriver(struct nfs_server *, u32 id);
void unset_pnfs_layoutdriver(struct nfs_server *);
@@ -252,7 +251,6 @@ pnfs_layout_roc_iomode(struct nfs_inode *nfsi)
static inline int pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino,
struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
- const nfs4_stateid *stateid, /* optional */
enum pnfs_layoutreturn_type type,
bool wait)
{
@@ -261,7 +259,7 @@ static inline int pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino,
if (pnfs_enabled_sb(nfss) &&
(type != RETURN_FILE || has_layout(nfsi)))
- return _pnfs_return_layout(ino, range, stateid, type, wait);
+ return _pnfs_return_layout(ino, range, type, wait);
return 0;
}
@@ -350,7 +348,6 @@ pnfs_layout_roc_iomode(struct nfs_inode *nfsi)
static inline int pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino,
struct pnfs_layout_range *range,
- const nfs4_stateid *stateid, /* optional */
enum pnfs_layoutreturn_type type,
bool wait)
{
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-12 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 9:35 [PATCH 1/1] pnfs_submit: Restore forgetful mode io draining Fred Isaman
2010-10-12 18:04 ` Benny Halevy [this message]
2010-10-12 18:48 ` Fred Isaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CB4A332.8090803@panasas.com \
--to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=iisaman@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox