linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <openosd@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nathan Laredo <laredo@gnu.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Alessio Igor Bogani <alessioigorbogani@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 16:12:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE928DD.2010309@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin0Gm8Xqm-ARGmd4T+fCM4mMA0=PbDA6eSsYUOG@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/19/2010 01:40 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>>
>>  Just for info, UDF BKL removal patches seem to work fine but I want to
>> give them some final SMP testing on Monday before pushing them to -next.
>> I'm not sure how much people hurry with disabling the lock so if I should
>> push them ASAP or whether the next merge window is fine...
> 
> I don't think I can reasonably do it in 37, we're late enough in the
> -rc series. So UDF and really saying 'n' to BKL by default will have
> to be for the next merge window.
> 
> I hate to do it, but I'd be too nervous about it any other way.
> 
>                    Linus

Could it not default to "n" but be SELECTed by the like of UDF. Or
that too big of a Kconfig change for 37-rcX? I understand it does
not really buy us anything for distro's with allmodconfig style,
but it should help with defconfig on all the other ARCH's.

Thanks
Boaz

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-21 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-17 15:26 [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-17 15:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] BKL: remove references to lock_kernel from comments Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-17 15:40   ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-18 23:34 ` [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up Jan Kara
2010-11-18 23:40   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-21 14:12     ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2010-11-21 17:45       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-22 15:17         ` Nick Bowler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CE928DD.2010309@gmail.com \
    --to=openosd@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alessioigorbogani@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=laredo@gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).