Re: [PATCH 09/16] pnfs: wave 3: shift pnfs_update_layout locations

[Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>]

On 2011-02-15 09:41, Fred Isaman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Trond Myklebust
> <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 14:18 -0500, andros@netapp.com wrote:
>>> From: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
>>>
>>> Move the pnfs_update_layout call location to nfs_pageio_do_add_request().
>>> Grab the lseg sent in the doio function to nfs_read_rpcsetup and attach
>>> it to each nfs_read_data so it can be sent to the layout driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Adamon <andros@netapp.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Adamon <andros@citi.umich.edu>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dean Hildebrand <dhildeb@us.ibm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@citi.umich.edu>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Guo <guotao@nrchpc.ac.cn>
>>> ---
>>>  fs/nfs/file.c            |    4 ----
>>>  fs/nfs/pagelist.c        |   15 ++++++++++++---
>>>  fs/nfs/pnfs.c            |    4 ++--
>>>  fs/nfs/pnfs.h            |    1 +
>>>  fs/nfs/read.c            |   28 ++++++++++++++++------------
>>>  fs/nfs/write.c           |    4 ++--
>>>  include/linux/nfs_page.h |    5 +++--
>>>  include/linux/nfs_xdr.h  |    1 +
>>>  8 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
>>> index 7bf029e..d85a534 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfs/file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
>>> @@ -387,10 +387,6 @@ static int nfs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
>>>               file->f_path.dentry->d_name.name,
>>>               mapping->host->i_ino, len, (long long) pos);
>>>
>>> -     pnfs_update_layout(mapping->host,
>>> -                        nfs_file_open_context(file),
>>> -                        IOMODE_RW);
>>> -
>>>  start:
>>>       /*
>>>        * Prevent starvation issues if someone is doing a consistency
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
>>> index e1164e3..e0a0cb4 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
>>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>>>  #include <linux/nfs_mount.h>
>>>
>>>  #include "internal.h"
>>> +#include "pnfs.h"
>>>
>>>  static struct kmem_cache *nfs_page_cachep;
>>>
>>> @@ -213,7 +214,7 @@ nfs_wait_on_request(struct nfs_page *req)
>>>   */
>>>  void nfs_pageio_init(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *desc,
>>>                    struct inode *inode,
>>> -                  int (*doio)(struct inode *, struct list_head *, unsigned int, size_t, int),
>>> +                  int (*doio)(struct inode *, struct list_head *, unsigned int, size_t, int, struct pnfs_layout_segment *),
>>>                    size_t bsize,
>>>                    int io_flags)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -226,6 +227,7 @@ void nfs_pageio_init(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *desc,
>>>       desc->pg_doio = doio;
>>>       desc->pg_ioflags = io_flags;
>>>       desc->pg_error = 0;
>>> +     desc->pg_lseg = NULL;
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /**
>>> @@ -288,8 +290,13 @@ static int nfs_pageio_do_add_request(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *desc,
>>>               prev = nfs_list_entry(desc->pg_list.prev);
>>>               if (!nfs_can_coalesce_requests(prev, req))
>>>                       return 0;
>>> -     } else
>>> +     } else {
>>> +             put_lseg(desc->pg_lseg);
>>>               desc->pg_base = req->wb_pgbase;
>>> +             desc->pg_lseg = pnfs_update_layout(desc->pg_inode,
>>> +                                                req->wb_context,
>>> +                                                IOMODE_READ);
>>
>> Looking at this afresh after a week of vacation. Isn't it more natural
>> to do this as part of the pg_doio() callback?
>>
>> Your only reason for introducing the ->pg_lseg pointer is to be able to
>> pass it to the ->pg_doio() in the first place. Why not do that by simply
>> passing the 'desc' pointer to ->pg_doio(), and then having it call
>> pnfs_update_layout() instead of 'get_layout()'?
>>
> 
> The problem is that it is not the only reason.  Passing the lseg into
> the nfs_can_coalesce_requests is another.  Calling pnfs_update_layout
> in ->pg_doio would be eliminate the opportunity to have a say in
> coalescing based on the layout.
> 
> 

As long as you correctly deal with short I/Os in to doio path (like we did
many moons ago) you should be fine if the layout you got does not cover
the whole coalesced range.

>>> +     }
>>>       nfs_list_remove_request(req);
>>>       nfs_list_add_request(req, &desc->pg_list);
>>>       desc->pg_count = newlen;
>>> @@ -307,7 +314,8 @@ static void nfs_pageio_doio(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *desc)
>>>                                         nfs_page_array_len(desc->pg_base,
>>>                                                            desc->pg_count),
>>>                                         desc->pg_count,
>>> -                                       desc->pg_ioflags);
>>> +                                       desc->pg_ioflags,
>>> +                                       desc->pg_lseg);
>>>               if (error < 0)
>>>                       desc->pg_error = error;
>>>               else
>>> @@ -345,6 +353,7 @@ int nfs_pageio_add_request(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *desc,
>>>  void nfs_pageio_complete(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *desc)
>>>  {
>>>       nfs_pageio_doio(desc);
>>> +     put_lseg(desc->pg_lseg);
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /**
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>> index f0a9578..dcd4356 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ put_lseg_locked(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg,
>>>       return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -static void
>>> +void
>>>  put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>>>  {
>>>       struct inode *ino;
>>> @@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>>>               pnfs_free_lseg_list(&free_me);
>>>       }
>>>  }
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(put_lseg);
>>
>> Why is this needed here?
>>
> 
> That looks like an artifact left over from older code.  It is not needed.
> 
>>
>>> static bool
>>>  should_free_lseg(u32 lseg_iomode, u32 recall_iomode)
>>> @@ -797,7 +798,6 @@ pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino,
>>>  out:
>>>       dprintk("%s end, state 0x%lx lseg %p\n", __func__,
>>>               nfsi->layout ? nfsi->layout->plh_flags : -1, lseg);
>>> -     put_lseg(lseg); /* STUB - callers currently ignore return value */
>>>       return lseg;
>>>  out_unlock:
>>>       spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
>>> index 9a994bc..121d6a3 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
>>> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ extern int nfs4_proc_layoutget(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp);
>>>
>>>  /* pnfs.c */
>>>  void get_layout_hdr(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo);
>>> +void put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg);
>>>  struct pnfs_layout_segment *
>>>  pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino, struct nfs_open_context *ctx,
>>>                  enum pnfs_iomode access_type);
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/read.c b/fs/nfs/read.c
>>> index aedcaa7..c453164 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfs/read.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/read.c
>>> @@ -20,17 +20,17 @@
>>>  #include <linux/nfs_page.h>
>>>
>>>  #include <asm/system.h>
>>> +#include "pnfs.h"
>>>
>>>  #include "nfs4_fs.h"
>>>  #include "internal.h"
>>>  #include "iostat.h"
>>>  #include "fscache.h"
>>> -#include "pnfs.h"
>>>
>>>  #define NFSDBG_FACILITY              NFSDBG_PAGECACHE
>>>
>>> -static int nfs_pagein_multi(struct inode *, struct list_head *, unsigned int, size_t, int);
>>> -static int nfs_pagein_one(struct inode *, struct list_head *, unsigned int, size_t, int);
>>> +static int nfs_pagein_multi(struct inode *, struct list_head *, unsigned int, size_t, int, struct pnfs_layout_segment *);
>>> +static int nfs_pagein_one(struct inode *, struct list_head *, unsigned int, size_t, int, struct pnfs_layout_segment *);
>>>  static const struct rpc_call_ops nfs_read_partial_ops;
>>>  static const struct rpc_call_ops nfs_read_full_ops;
>>>
>>> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ void nfs_readdata_free(struct nfs_read_data *p)
>>>  static void nfs_readdata_release(struct nfs_read_data *rdata)
>>>  {
>>>       put_nfs_open_context(rdata->args.context);
>>> +     put_lseg(rdata->lseg);
>>
>> Shouldn't you be calling put_lseg() _before_ put_nfs_open_context()? You
>> are not guaranteed that the inode still exists after that call.
>>

Good catch.  If we need the layout to outlive the open context then
we should get a reference on the inode using iget and iput the inode
in put_layout_hdr_locked.

Benny
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Fred