From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] pnfs: layout_driver MUST set .free_deviceid_node if using dev-cache
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 13:54:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDB8E68.2030504@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DDB8DD1.20101@panasas.com>
A device cache is not a matter of memory store. It is a matter
of mounting/login and unmounting/logout. So it is not logical
to not set free_deviceid_node. Who will do the unmount?
It is better to crash the developer then let him leak mounts.
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c | 16 ++++------------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c
index 37ca215..1b592d9 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c
@@ -163,10 +163,7 @@ nfs4_delete_deviceid(const struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type *ld,
d = nfs4_unhash_put_deviceid(ld, clp, id);
if (!d)
return;
- if (d->ld->free_deviceid_node)
- d->ld->free_deviceid_node(d);
- else
- kfree(d);
+ d->ld->free_deviceid_node(d);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs4_delete_deviceid);
@@ -232,8 +229,7 @@ nfs4_put_deviceid_node(struct nfs4_deviceid_node *d)
hlist_del_init_rcu(&d->node);
spin_unlock(&nfs4_deviceid_lock);
synchronize_rcu();
- if (d->ld->free_deviceid_node)
- d->ld->free_deviceid_node(d);
+ d->ld->free_deviceid_node(d);
return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs4_put_deviceid_node);
@@ -258,12 +254,8 @@ _deviceid_purge_client(const struct nfs_client *clp, long hash)
synchronize_rcu();
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(d, n, next, &tmp, node)
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&d->ref)) {
- if (d->ld->free_deviceid_node)
- d->ld->free_deviceid_node(d);
- else
- kfree(d);
- }
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&d->ref))
+ d->ld->free_deviceid_node(d);
}
void
--
1.7.2.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 10:52 [PATCHS 0/3] Some more bugs in latest code + please help with last problem Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 10:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] SQUSHME: pnfs: BUG in _deviceid_purge_client Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 10:54 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2011-05-24 10:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] SQUASHME: pnfs-obj: objlayout wants to cache devices until unmount Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDB8E68.2030504@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).