From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] SQUASHME: pnfs-obj: Bugs in new global-device-cache code
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 20:18:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDBE863.5020307@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DDBE767.6030803@panasas.com>
On 05/24/2011 08:14 PM, Benny Halevy wrote:
> On 2011-05-24 18:07, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> Fix BUGs in the new "Use global-device-cache".
>>
>> One thing I don't understand is why the compiler did
>> not complain when the code was returning the wrong
>> type of structure
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
>> ---
>> fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c b/fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c
>> index 167cd1e..faacde2 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c
>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ objio_free_deviceid_node(struct nfs4_deviceid_node *d)
>> {
>> struct objio_dev_ent *de = container_of(d, struct objio_dev_ent, id_node);
>>
>> + dprintk("%s: free od=%p\n", __func__, de->od);
>> osduld_put_device(de->od);
>> kfree(de);
>> }
>> @@ -64,14 +65,18 @@ static struct objio_dev_ent *_dev_list_find(const struct nfs_server *nfss,
>> const struct nfs4_deviceid *d_id)
>> {
>> struct nfs4_deviceid_node *d;
>> + struct objio_dev_ent *de;
>>
>> d = nfs4_find_get_deviceid(nfss->pnfs_curr_ld, nfss->nfs_client, d_id);
>> if (!d)
>> return NULL;
>> - return container_of(d, struct objio_dev_ent, id_node);
>> +
>> + de = container_of(d, struct objio_dev_ent, id_node);
>> + return de;
>
> That's not really required as container_of() does the type casting
> for you.
>
Ye, I know that change is just a left over from a print between the
set and the return. (Else how could I debug this)
I than removed the print because these come a lot in a git clone for
example.
>> }
>>
>> -static int _dev_list_add(const struct nfs_server *nfss,
>> +static struct objio_dev_ent *
>> +_dev_list_add(const struct nfs_server *nfss,
>> const struct nfs4_deviceid *d_id, struct osd_dev *od,
>> gfp_t gfp_flags)
>> {
>> @@ -79,9 +84,12 @@ static int _dev_list_add(const struct nfs_server *nfss,
>> struct objio_dev_ent *de = kzalloc(sizeof(*de), gfp_flags);
>> struct objio_dev_ent *n;
>>
>> - if (!de)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> + if (!de) {
>> + dprintk("%s: -ENOMEM od=%p\n", __func__, od);
>> + return NULL;
>
> better return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM)
> that will percolate up the stack via _device_lookup.
>
Right missed that one
> Thanks!
>
What thanks? beers on you next time! ;-)
> Benny
>
Boaz
>> + }
>>
>> + dprintk("%s: Adding od=%p\n", __func__, od);
>> nfs4_init_deviceid_node(&de->id_node,
>> nfss->pnfs_curr_ld,
>> nfss->nfs_client,
>> @@ -91,11 +99,12 @@ static int _dev_list_add(const struct nfs_server *nfss,
>> d = nfs4_insert_deviceid_node(&de->id_node);
>> n = container_of(d, struct objio_dev_ent, id_node);
>> if (n != de) {
>> - BUG_ON(n->od != od);
>> + dprintk("%s: Race with other n->od=%p\n", __func__, n->od);
>> objio_free_deviceid_node(&de->id_node);
>> + de = n;
>> }
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + return de;
>> }
>>
>> struct caps_buffers {
>> @@ -117,7 +126,7 @@ struct objio_segment {
>> unsigned comps_index;
>> unsigned num_comps;
>> /* variable length */
>> - struct objio_dev_ent *ods[0];
>> + struct objio_dev_ent *ods[];
>> };
>>
>> static inline struct objio_segment *
>> @@ -176,12 +185,13 @@ static struct objio_dev_ent *_device_lookup(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *pnfslay,
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - _dev_list_add(NFS_SERVER(pnfslay->plh_inode), d_id, od, gfp_flags);
>> + ode = _dev_list_add(NFS_SERVER(pnfslay->plh_inode), d_id, od,
>> + gfp_flags);
>>
>> out:
>> dprintk("%s: return=%d\n", __func__, err);
>> objlayout_put_deviceinfo(deviceaddr);
>> - return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : od;
>> + return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : ode;
>> }
>>
>> static int objio_devices_lookup(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *pnfslay,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 14:52 [PATCHES 00/12] Mostly a Resend of ALL Bug fixes and SQUASHMEs - pnfs-submit 2.6.40 V7 Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 15:04 ` [PATCH 01/12] NFSv4.1: use layout driver in global device cache Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 15:04 ` [PATCH 02/12] SQUASHME: Bug in new global-device-cache code Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 16:52 ` Benny Halevy
2011-05-24 17:00 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 17:02 ` Benny Halevy
2011-05-24 15:05 ` [PATCH 03/12] SQUSHME: pnfs: BUG in _deviceid_purge_client Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 16:57 ` Benny Halevy
2011-05-24 15:05 ` [PATCH 04/12] pnfs: layout_driver MUST set free_deviceid_node if using dev-cache Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 17:04 ` Benny Halevy
2011-05-24 15:06 ` [PATCH 05/12] SQUASHME: pnfs-obj: pnfs_osd_xdr.h Remove server definitions Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 15:06 ` [PATCH 06/12] SQUASHME: pnf-obj xdr_cli: Wrong type in comments Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 15:06 ` [PATCH 07/12] SQUASHME: pnfs-obj: use layout driver in global device cache Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 15:06 ` [PATCH 08/12] SQUASHME: objio alloc/free lseg Bugs fixes Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 17:06 ` Benny Halevy
2011-05-24 15:07 ` [PATCH 09/12] SQUASHME: pnfs-obj: Bugs in new global-device-cache code Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 17:14 ` Benny Halevy
2011-05-24 17:18 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2011-05-24 15:08 ` [PATCH 10/12] SQUASHME: pnfs-obj: objlayout wants to cache devices until unmount Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 17:17 ` Benny Halevy
2011-05-24 15:08 ` [PATCH 11/12] SQUASHME: pnfs: Fall out from: non-rpc layout drivers Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-24 15:10 ` [PATCH 12/12] SQUASHME: objio read/write patch: Bugs fixes Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDBE863.5020307@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).