Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
Cc: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
	trond@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: filelayout should use nfs_generic_pg_test
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:56:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DE68B59.3030402@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=Bwuuar76phVyEguB1Amqn4Q70Fw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2011-06-01 19:01, Fred Isaman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> wrote:
>> On 2011-06-01 17:44, Weston Andros Adamson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:47 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 06/01/2011 06:18 AM, Weston Andros Adamson wrote:
>>>>> Use nfs_generic_pg_test instead of pnfs_generic_pg_test.
>>>>>
>>>>> This fixes the BUG at fs/nfs/write.c:941 introduced by
>>>>> 89a58e32d9105c01022a757fb32ddc3b51bf0025.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was able to trigger this BUG reliably using pynfs in pnfs mode,
>>>>> by using dd(1) to write many small blocks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Fix proposed by Trond.
>>>>>
>>>>> Benny- Does this make sense?
>>>>>
>>>>> fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c  |    2 +-
>>>>> fs/nfs/pagelist.c        |    5 ++++-
>>>>> include/linux/nfs_page.h |    3 ++-
>>>>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c
>>>>> index 4269088..1c3bb72 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c
>>>>> @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ filelayout_pg_test(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *pgio, struct nfs_page *prev,
>>>>>     u64 p_stripe, r_stripe;
>>>>>     u32 stripe_unit;
>>>>>
>>>>> -   if (!pnfs_generic_pg_test(pgio, prev, req))
>>>>> +   if (!nfs_generic_pg_test(pgio, prev, req))
>>>>>             return 0;
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> pnfs_generic_pg_test is the one that gets the layout.
>>>>
>>>> What you've done is revert to MDS IO
>>>>
>>>> Boaz
>>>
>>> Ah, you're right - I didn't even notice that!  I usually confirm client -> DS communication with tcpdump.  I was working for too long yesterday :)
>>>
>>> Patch: recalled.  Discussion about a real fix: started.
>>>
>>> -dros
>>
>> I think the following should work:
>>
>> Benny
>>
>> git diff --stat -p -M
>>  fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c |   10 ++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c
>> index 4269088..9f1d445 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c
>> @@ -661,6 +661,16 @@ filelayout_pg_test(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor
>> *pgio, struct nfs_page *prev,
>>        u64 p_stripe, r_stripe;
>>        u32 stripe_unit;
>>
>> +       /*
>> +        * FIXME: ideally we should be able to coalesce all requests
>> +        * that are not block boundary aligned, but currently this
>> +        * is problematic for the case of bsize < PAGE_CACHE_SIZE,
>> +        * since nfs_flush_multi and nfs_pagein_multi assume you
>> +        * can have only one struct nfs_page.
>> +        */
>> +       if (desc->pg_bsize < PAGE_SIZE)
>> +               return 0;
>> +
>>        if (!pnfs_generic_pg_test(pgio, prev, req))
>>                return 0;
>>
> 
> Note this moves a test that was once part of the plain nfs code into
> the file layout driver.  Why don't other drivers need this test?

True.  Note I said it would work, not that it's the right fix? :-/
This just tells us what change exposed this issue...

Boaz moved this check to the nfs only path assuming that pg_bsize,
which holds the MDS's wsize/rsize is irrelevant for coalescing requests
for striping over pnfs.

I'm still convinced why nfs_flush_multi cannot use desc->pg_lseg
if it exists, but at the same time it seems like not doing the
right thing for pnfs coalescing in nfs_pageio_init_write and
nfs_pageio_do_add_request.

For pnfs, we need to ignore wsize, meaning we first need to try
to coalesce the pages and then decide if we're going the nfs_flush_multi
or the nfs_flush_one way, based on the coalesced length.

Benny

> 
> Fred
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-01 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-01  3:18 [PATCH] NFS: filelayout should use nfs_generic_pg_test Weston Andros Adamson
2011-06-01  5:47 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-06-01 12:14   ` Trond Myklebust
2011-06-01 13:36     ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-06-01 13:43       ` Benny Halevy
2011-06-01 14:32         ` Benny Halevy
2011-06-01 14:44   ` Weston Andros Adamson
2011-06-01 14:51     ` Benny Halevy
2011-06-01 15:36       ` Weston Andros Adamson
2011-06-01 16:01       ` Fred Isaman
2011-06-01 18:56         ` Benny Halevy [this message]
2011-06-01 19:17           ` Trond Myklebust
2011-06-01 19:29             ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-06-01 19:38               ` Trond Myklebust
2011-06-01 19:49                 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-06-01 19:52                   ` Trond Myklebust
2011-06-01 18:07       ` Trond Myklebust
2011-06-01 19:13         ` Benny Halevy
2011-06-01 19:29           ` Trond Myklebust
2011-06-01 20:09             ` Benny Halevy
2011-06-06 16:47               ` William A. (Andy) Adamson
2011-06-06 18:21                 ` Benny Halevy
2011-06-06 18:22                   ` Myklebust, Trond

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DE68B59.3030402@panasas.com \
    --to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
    --cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=dros@netapp.com \
    --cc=iisaman@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond@netapp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox