Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] open() of device special files
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 07:32:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4A5546.2090208@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110815212539.GA32181@fieldses.org>



On 08/15/2011 05:25 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:03:30AM -0700, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: J. Bruce Fields [mailto:bfields@fieldses.org]
>>> How is the client supposed to handle opens of device special files?
>> On
>>> a 3.1-rc1-based client to a linux server over v4.0 I'm seeing it try
>> an
>>> OPEN call and failing when it gets an INVAL return.
>>>
>>> This looks like bogus client behavior (OPEN should fail on such
>> files),
>>> unless the server has the error return wrong and the client's using an
>>> OPEN error to recover.
>>>
>>> If I first stat the device and then open it then it works as expected
>>> (the client does an open of the local device).
>>>
>>> I'm a bit annoyed at myself as I have a feeling we've discussed this
>>> before but I can't find a reference now.
>>
>> Hmm... NFS4ERR_INVAL means 'invalid argument', which is not the case
>> here; all the arguments that the client is passing to the server are
>> valid, however the file cannot be opened because the pathname resolves
>> on the server to a file of the wrong type.
>>
>> I can't see any other error definition that is "obviously correct", but
>> it looks to me as if NFS4ERR_SYMLINK might be the closest thing. One
>> reason is the dot-x file defines NFS4ERR_SYMLINK as meaning "should be
>> file/directory". The other reason is that NFS4ERR_SYMLINK should
>> _always_ trigger the correct behaviour on a client: a fresh lookup of
>> the component.
> 
> Confirmed the fix; I'll apply.
Confirmed! The following open now works with all NFS versions:

int main (void)
{
int fd;
char buf[20];
size_t nbytes;
ssize_t bytes_read;
nbytes = sizeof(buf);
fd = open("/mnt/dev/urandom", O_RDONLY|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK);
if (fd < 0) {
	perror("open");
	exit(1);
}
bytes_read = read(fd, buf, nbytes);
return 0;
}

Thanks!

steved.

> 
> But that's tricky--we should be document it for other server
> implementers if it's the right thing to do (working group list cc'd).
> 
> --b.
> 
> commit 3d83c016da8652f30dcac372772b67d68f33bfbd
> Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> Date:   Mon Aug 15 16:55:02 2011 -0400
> 
>     nfsd4: return nfserr_symlink on v4 OPEN of non-regular file
>     
>     Without this, an attempt to open a device special file without first
>     stat'ing it will fail.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> index 90c6aa6..cc8eb8d 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,17 @@ nfsd_mode_check(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, umode_t mode, int type)
>  			return nfserr_notdir;
>  		else if ((mode & S_IFMT) == S_IFDIR)
>  			return nfserr_isdir;
> +		/*
> +		 * err_symlink is our catch-all error in the v4 case; this
> +		 * looks odd, but:
> +		 *	- the comment next to ERR_SYMLINK in file is
> +		 *	  "should be file/directory"
> +		 *	- we happen to know this will cause the linux v4
> +		 *	  client to do the right thing on attempts to open
> +		 *	  something other than a regular file:
> +		 */
> +		else if (rqstp->rq_vers == 4)
> +			return nfserr_symlink;
>  		else
>  			return nfserr_inval;
>  	}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-16 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-15 15:36 open() of device special files J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-15 16:03 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-08-15 21:25   ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-15 22:23     ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-15 22:27       ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-16  5:04         ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-08-16 11:03           ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-16  5:03       ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-08-16 10:49         ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-15 22:28     ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-15 22:30       ` [PATCH 1/5] nfsd4: clean up S_IS -> NF4 file type mapping J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-15 22:30       ` [PATCH 2/5] nfsd4: return nfserr_symlink on v4 OPEN of non-regular file J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-15 22:30       ` [PATCH 3/5] nfsd4: fix incorrect comment in nfsd4_set_nfs4_acl J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-15 22:30       ` [PATCH 4/5] nfsd: open-code special directory-hardlink check J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-15 22:30       ` [PATCH 5/5] nfsd: clean up nfsd_mode_check() J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-15 22:48         ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-16 11:32     ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2011-08-17  0:52     ` open() of device special files J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-17  1:40   ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E4A5546.2090208@RedHat.com \
    --to=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfsv4@ietf.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox