From: supertimothy <supertimothy@web.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfsv4 and gracetime / leasetime grace_period
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:18:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E6FE4D1.20209@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110913124440.GA22118@fieldses.org>
Am 13.09.2011 14:44, schrieb J. Bruce Fields:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:43:37AM +0200, Tim wrote:
>> But how does the notification of clients work with nfsv4?
> There is no notification. Clients poll the server regularly, and that's
> how they find out there's been a reboot.
>
Ah polling, that explains a lot.
>> The problem I can see is the same as described here:
>> http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/18978/22974/
>>
>> So we have different values:
>>
>> /proc/fs/nfsd/nfsv4gracetime
>> /proc/fs/nfsd/nfsv4leasetime
>> /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nlm_grace_period
>>
>> If I set graceteime and grace_period to a low value, I get a faster
>> failover. But what do they stand for and do I need nfsv4leasetime to ?
>> If I set them all to 10 seconds, could that be "dangerous" (assume the
>> server can handle the additional load)?
> It's probably OK. The clients will have to send an rpc to the server at
> least every 10 seconds, or they lose their state. So if there's a
> chance they wouldn't be able to get through for 10 seconds, you could
> have a problem.
Thanks for clarifying this! I brought the time down to about 15 secs in
failover situation, that is really OK for me.
>> I guess there isnt an easy way to delete all the locks on serverside and
>> explicitely tell the clients: Hey, the server has rebooted, please get a new
>> lock for all your files
:-)
>> I just would like to make failover a bit faster.
> We do need to think about how to make that faster, but that wouldn't be
> the solution. The problem is that the new server needs to wait before
> granting any new locks or opens until it knows all the clients have had
> the chance to reclaim their old ones. The only way the server currently
> hsa to do that is to wait out the grace period (== the previous server's
> lease time).
Thanks a lot for your answer Bruce!
Some more questions here - I try to unterstand this and I am a bit
struggling with RFC3530. I'd be glad if you/someone could tell me if I'm
wrong..
/proc/fs/nfsd/nfsv4leasetime
The server gives out leases that are valid for this time. The client has
to renew its lease until nfsv4leasetime times out or the server will
release the concerning lock.
/proc/fs/nfsd/nfsv4gracetime
After a failover (or reboot), the other server starts. As soon as it is
up and running, the grace period starts during which no client is
allowed to write or get a new lock. The time should be chosen so that
all open locks can be renewed which should be possible whithin
nfsv4leasetime, because the client has to send a RENEW until
nfsv4leasetime is over. Thats why leasetime should be smaller than
gracetime.
Lets say the server needs longer than leasetime to boot. Is the
leasetime pronlonged until the client gets a signal and then sends a
RENEW or is it just invalid and the server has to drop the locks after
gracetime?
/proc/sys/fs/nfs/nlm_grace_period
This is the part I don't understand what it is for. I read it has to be
shrunk too (I set it to 10 - which works). Standard value is 0.
Thanks!
Tim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-14 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-13 9:43 nfsv4 and gracetime / leasetime grace_period Tim
2011-09-13 12:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-13 23:18 ` supertimothy [this message]
2011-09-14 2:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 6:27 ` AW: " Tim
2011-09-14 21:34 ` 'J. Bruce Fields'
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E6FE4D1.20209@web.de \
--to=supertimothy@web.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).