From: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@aixigo.de>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: nfs3 30% faster than nfs4?
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:53:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9BDF01.6090106@aixigo.de> (raw)
Hi folks,
I did a brief test on a local nfs server: Extracting the
linux kernel sources on a nfs partition it seems that nfs3
is 30% faster than nfs4. For nfs3 I got 5.2MB/sec. Nfs4
gave me just 3.8MB/sec. The server was idle except for this
test.
Client and server were running 2.6.39 from the Debian backports
repository. I just changed the mount option on the client to
select nfs3 or nfs4.
I don't want to complain, but I did not expect this huge loss
in performance for moving to nfs4. Any helpful comment would be
highly appreciated.
Harri
next reply other threads:[~2011-10-17 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-17 7:53 Harald Dunkel [this message]
2011-10-17 13:39 ` nfs3 30% faster than nfs4? J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E9BDF01.6090106@aixigo.de \
--to=harald.dunkel@aixigo.de \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).