From: Nigel Roberts <nigel@nobiscuit.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFSv4 server on ARM
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:55:50 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EA39046.6020207@nobiscuit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110529132515.GB19451@snippy.nobiscuit.com>
On 05/29/2011 11:25 PM, Nigel Roberts wrote:
> I've run into a problem with running an nfsv4 server on a Marvell
> Kirkwood (armv5tel) platform. When copying a large file (>1GB) to
> the NFS server, thewrite speed will suddenly slow down to ~750kB/s
> and the CPU wait will jump to 100% for the remainder of the transfer.
I've been doing some large file transfers recently and I've run into
another similar problem, but this time it's system CPU instead of I/O
wait. I've done some more testing and I've found the following:
* Seems to only affect nfsv4, I can't reproduce it with nfsv3
* It appears to be triggered when free memory is low i.e. the file size
is large enough to cause cache memory to reach its maximum.
* Happens with both SLAB and SLUB
* Happens with sec=krb5, krb5i and krb5p
* If I transfer a file that's small enough to fit into free memory, the
problem doesn't occur.
Here are the exports on the server (Debian squeeze + 3.0.7 kernel +
latest nfs packages from testing on an iomega ix2-200 marvell kirkwood
system)
/var/store/exports/backups
*(sec=krb5:krb5i:krb5p,rw,nohide,sync,no_subtree_check)
/var/store/exports/backups
oobie.home.nobiscuit.com(rw,async,no_subtree_check)
Here are the fstab entries on the client (Ubuntu Oneric, x86_64)
blue.home.nobiscuit.com:/var/store/exports/backups
/test/backup-nfs3 nfs rw,proto=tcp,user,noauto 0 0
blue.home.nobiscuit.com:/backups /test/backup-nfs4 nfs4
rw,proto=tcp,user,noauto,sec=krb5 0 0
Here's what a an nfsv3 transfer looks like in vmstat (vmstat 2 with swap
information removed)
procs -----------memory---------- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache bi bo in cs us sy id wa
0 0 1940 4068 8516 214252 0 0 32 10 0 0 100 0
0 0 1940 4068 8516 214252 0 0 32 11 0 0 100 0
0 0 1940 4068 8516 214252 0 0 32 9 0 0 100 0
<transfer starts here>
2 0 1940 204348 8516 16588 0 194 2139 2951 0 34 66 0
0 0 1940 190824 8516 29988 0 7522 3835 5188 0 42 59 0
1 0 1940 176148 8528 44644 0 5957 4266 5394 0 50 49 2
2 0 1940 163248 8532 57588 0 4095 3832 5006 0 34 66 0
1 0 1940 149456 8536 71308 0 5388 3972 5117 0 39 62 0
2 0 1940 137104 8544 83404 0 10068 3642 4624 0 42 56 3
4 0 1940 127336 8544 92364 0 5761 2737 3796 0 32 68 0
1 0 1940 112804 8552 107308 0 2393 4314 5613 0 42 58 1
0 0 1940 98284 8552 121612 0 8698 4131 5324 0 40 60 0
2 0 1940 84604 8552 135116 0 5316 4017 5192 0 48 52 0
0 0 1940 72244 8560 147308 0 8186 3523 4625 0 42 57 2
0 0 1940 59944 8560 159340 0 8860 3564 4602 0 41 59 0
1 0 1940 46684 8568 172396 0 2064 3824 5040 0 37 62 1
1 0 1940 33784 8568 185132 0 7026 3506 4612 0 37 63 0
1 0 1940 20824 8572 197876 0 9442 3780 4862 0 39 62 0
1 0 1940 7264 8580 211220 0 5844 3882 5133 0 42 57 2
0 0 1940 2704 8448 215824 0 4098 4271 5392 0 47 54 0
0 0 1940 2688 8452 215680 0 8450 4109 5123 1 47 50 3
0 0 1940 3064 8444 215276 0 7300 3787 4909 0 34 66 0
0 0 1940 3116 8444 215212 0 8850 3488 4524 0 37 63 0
1 0 1940 2688 8456 215564 0 8815 3982 4924 0 41 58 2
0 0 1940 2980 8448 215488 0 1 4101 5408 0 44 57 0
3 0 1940 3688 8456 214108 0 9047 3783 4880 0 44 55 2
1 0 1940 2816 8448 215636 0 8867 3285 4452 0 35 66 0
...
The transfer continues to the end with neither a sudden jump in the sy
number nor any drop in bo.
Here is a transfer with the same file to the same location, using nfsv4
with sec=krb5:
procs -----------memory---------- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache bi bo in cs us sy id wa
0 0 1940 3072 8432 215320 0 0 32 11 0 0 100 0
0 0 1940 3072 8432 215320 0 0 31 10 0 0 100 0
0 0 1940 3072 8432 215320 0 0 31 10 0 0 100 0
<transfer starts here>
0 0 1940 3072 8440 215344 6 20 75 101 0 1 97 3
0 0 1940 3072 8456 215344 0 20 125 172 1 1 93 5
0 0 1940 203404 8476 17556 0 50 2394 3514 0 44 52 5
1 0 1940 191316 8480 29216 0 9299 3333 4694 0 39 61 0
2 0 1940 179876 8496 40952 0 26 3382 4837 0 42 56 1
1 0 1940 167472 8496 53364 0 6605 3514 5091 0 37 63 0
0 0 1940 155892 8496 64948 0 5128 3249 4691 0 37 63 0
1 0 1940 144312 8504 76372 0 4664 3182 4652 0 38 61 2
1 0 1940 130856 8504 89588 0 6760 3694 5102 0 44 57 0
2 0 1940 115272 8516 104988 0 6519 4308 5937 0 50 49 2
2 0 1940 100752 8516 119220 0 5052 4062 5498 0 48 53 0
1 0 1940 85512 8516 134236 0 6425 4144 5791 0 49 51 0
0 0 1940 72192 8524 147388 0 4962 3629 5177 0 40 57 4
2 0 1940 59532 8524 159708 0 4928 3439 5080 0 33 68 0
2 0 1940 47652 8532 171452 0 15865 3290 4709 0 47 51 3
2 0 1940 33372 8532 185500 0 6142 3874 5541 0 47 54 0
3 0 1940 19632 8532 199036 0 6709 3793 5270 0 45 56 0
2 0 1940 6956 8540 211520 0 6598 3556 4900 0 40 58 2
2 0 1940 3132 8408 215328 0 4092 3494 5157 0 39 61 0
<sudden drop in performance here>
2 1 1940 2796 8540 215364 0 9439 1021 1191 0 92 9 0
1 1 1940 3096 8724 214612 0 740 429 486 0 100 0 0
1 1 1940 3096 8900 214656 0 728 424 471 0 100 0 0
1 1 1940 2856 9076 214808 0 760 449 477 0 100 0 0
1 1 1940 2616 9252 214820 0 712 420 466 0 100 0 0
1 1 1940 3096 9428 214108 0 792 467 490 0 100 0 0
1 1 1940 2976 9620 214120 0 784 456 498 0 100 0 0
1 1 1940 2556 9804 214292 0 804 461 495 0 100 0 0
...
The transfer will eventually complete, but obviously it takes much longer.
At the point where free memory reaches its lowest point, note the sudden
increase in sy and the big drop off in bo. Is it a memory allocation
problem? I've tried increasing the logging for nfsd but there's nothing
obvious that I can see.
Are there some other statistics I should be looking at? I've tried to
get ftrace working but I haven't had any luck yet (the ftrace tests fail
on boot).
Regards,
Nigel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-23 4:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-29 13:25 NFSv4 server on ARM Nigel Roberts
2011-06-05 1:39 ` Nigel Roberts
2011-10-23 3:55 ` Nigel Roberts [this message]
2011-11-22 19:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EA39046.6020207@nobiscuit.com \
--to=nigel@nobiscuit.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).