From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: unexpected NFS timeouts, related to sync/async soft mounts over TCP
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:31:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EBCF98E.6050101@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320957784.11956.16.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
On 10/11/11 20:43, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 15:52 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 10/11/11 15:29, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> On Nov 10, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 09/11/11 22:36, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>>>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Sorry. I am not sure I was clear. An EIO does not present itself with
>> a hard mount, but a TCP FIN is still injected into the stream by the
>> client, causing 15 seconds of deadlock, eventually fixed by sending a
>> RST and restarting with a new TCP stream. At this point, softmounts
>> throw an EIO while hardmounts restart and continue successfully.
>>
>> My problem is not the EIO on softmount or lack of EIO for hardmout, but
>> the fact that the client sees fit to try and close the TCP stream while
>> an apparently otherwise healthy NFS session is ongoing.
> The client will attempt to close the TCP connection on any RPC level
> error. That can happen, e.g., if the server sends a faulty RPC/TCP
> record fragment header or some other garbage data.
>
> I'm assuming that you've checked that the TCP parameters are set to sane
> values for a 10GigE connection (i.e. tcp_timestamps is on) so that there
> is no corruption happening at that level?
>
> Cheers
> Trond
I have a TCPdump/wireshark analysis of the entire packet stream (4GiB).
I cant see any RPC level errors (rpc.replystat != 0 yields no matches).
What specifically would I be looking for? Wireshark seems not to have
any problem decoding any of the RPC packets, so I hope that indicates no
RPC level corruption.
There is one case where the server sends a double write reply for the
same write, with different length fields. However, this is a good 20
seconds before the FIN is sent, so I was hoping that it was unrelated.
Might it not be?
As for TCP timestamps; I have a Timestamp option in each TCP packet.
Nothing appears corrupted. What would I be looking for with corrupted
timestamps?
Thanks,
--
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-11 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-09 18:38 unexpected NFS timeouts, related to sync/async soft mounts over TCP Andrew Cooper
2011-11-09 22:36 ` Chuck Lever
2011-11-10 11:15 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-11-10 15:29 ` Chuck Lever
2011-11-10 15:52 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-11-10 20:43 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-11-11 10:31 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2011-11-11 12:52 ` Jim Rees
2011-11-11 22:38 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-11-14 13:16 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-11-15 14:36 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-11-16 14:51 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EBCF98E.6050101@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox