public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: unexpected NFS timeouts, related to sync/async soft mounts over TCP
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:31:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EBCF98E.6050101@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320957784.11956.16.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>

On 10/11/11 20:43, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 15:52 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: 
>> On 10/11/11 15:29, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> On Nov 10, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 09/11/11 22:36, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>>>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Sorry.  I am not sure I was clear.  An EIO does not present itself with
>> a hard mount, but a TCP FIN is still injected into the stream by the
>> client, causing 15 seconds of deadlock, eventually fixed by sending a
>> RST and restarting with a new TCP stream.  At this point, softmounts
>> throw an EIO while hardmounts restart and continue successfully.
>>
>> My problem is not the EIO on softmount or lack of EIO for hardmout, but
>> the fact that the client sees fit to try and close the TCP stream while
>> an apparently otherwise healthy NFS session is ongoing.
> The client will attempt to close the TCP connection on any RPC level
> error. That can happen, e.g., if the server sends a faulty RPC/TCP
> record fragment header or some other garbage data.
>
> I'm assuming that you've checked that the TCP parameters are set to sane
> values for a 10GigE connection (i.e. tcp_timestamps is on) so that there
> is no corruption happening at that level?
>
> Cheers
>   Trond

I have a TCPdump/wireshark analysis of the entire packet stream (4GiB). 
I cant see any RPC level errors (rpc.replystat != 0 yields no matches). 
What specifically would I be looking for?  Wireshark seems not to have
any problem decoding any of the RPC packets, so I hope that indicates no
RPC level corruption.

There is one case where the server sends a double write reply for the
same write, with different length fields.  However, this is a good 20
seconds before the FIN is sent, so I was hoping that it was unrelated.
Might it not be?

As for TCP timestamps; I have a Timestamp option in each TCP packet. 
Nothing appears corrupted.  What would I be looking for with corrupted
timestamps?

Thanks,

-- 
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com


  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-11 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-09 18:38 unexpected NFS timeouts, related to sync/async soft mounts over TCP Andrew Cooper
2011-11-09 22:36 ` Chuck Lever
2011-11-10 11:15   ` Andrew Cooper
2011-11-10 15:29     ` Chuck Lever
2011-11-10 15:52       ` Andrew Cooper
2011-11-10 20:43         ` Trond Myklebust
2011-11-11 10:31           ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2011-11-11 12:52             ` Jim Rees
2011-11-11 22:38             ` Trond Myklebust
2011-11-14 13:16               ` Andrew Cooper
2011-11-15 14:36                 ` Andrew Cooper
2011-11-16 14:51                   ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EBCF98E.6050101@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox