linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Harald Dunkel <harri@afaics.de>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFSv4 fsid=0 export still necessary?
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 11:51:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDA5387.5070103@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EDA0650.9080702@afaics.de>



On 12/03/2011 06:21 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> several NFSv4-HOWTOs in the net require to export a root directory
> with fsid=0 first. Other exported directory trees should be nested
> within this root directory and exported with nohide. AFAIU the advan-
> tage of the root dir is that the client can mount "server:/somedir"
> instead of "server:/remote_mount_point/somedir".
> 
> Question: Is the common root directory optional? Since NFSv3 doesn't
> support this name space feature, wouldn't it be more wise to omit
> the root directory?
No, the fsid=0 export option is no longer necessary to make v4
exports compatible with v2/v3 exports. When the fsid option
is not set, the default root is define as "/" which allows
the v4 clients to mount the same exports as does the v2/v3 clients.

Now if you do not what "/" as your default root, you can
set fsid to something like fsid=/export. This will
change to default root to the /export directory which
means your v4 clients will only be able to access exports
under the /export directory. 

I believe the Linux server is the only server to have
this option...

steved.

> 
> 
> Any helpful comment would be highly appreciated
> 
> Harri
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAk7aBlAACgkQUTlbRTxpHjeO0wCggdEdfcBzswibHAOG6w2xJa5r
> B4QAn3MsYZR7xCh60c1X4AsNLnutXSPI
> =nEBr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-03 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-03 11:21 NFSv4 fsid=0 export still necessary? Harald Dunkel
2011-12-03 13:56 ` Jim Rees
2011-12-03 16:51 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2011-12-06  1:10   ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-12-07 16:30     ` Steve Dickson
2011-12-07 16:32       ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-12-07 21:17         ` Steve Dickson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EDA5387.5070103@RedHat.com \
    --to=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=harri@afaics.de \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).