From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from che.mayfirst.org ([209.234.253.108]:48190 "EHLO che.mayfirst.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752153Ab1LISbQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:31:16 -0500 Message-ID: <4EE253EC.2040609@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:31:08 -0500 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J. Bruce Fields" CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-image: on nfs4 server: RPC: AUTH_GSS upcall timed out Please check user daemon is running References: <8762hrozdl.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <20111208174501.GA30088@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20111208174501.GA30088@fieldses.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig19833F3FE96C87BA601B7529" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig19833F3FE96C87BA601B7529 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/08/2011 12:45 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > Yes, if you're using NFSv4 then the client and server should each run > both daemons. ah, thanks. >> If so, what functionality am i losing out on by not running it? >=20 > You lose NFSv4.0 delegations, which depend on the ability for the serve= r > to contact the client to send delegation recalls. Delegations are > optional, so you won't lose correctness, but you may lose some > performance. Thanks, that's useful. Do the clients need to run cachefilesd as well to take advantage of delegation? Is there a document where i could find this sort of information without adding noise to the list? > If you're using only v2, v3, or v4.1, that doesn't matter. (v2 and v3 > lack delegations, and v4.1 sends callbacks over existing > client-established connections). OK, gotcha. Is it possible to use 4.1 with linux kernel 3.1 and nfs-utils 1.2.5, or would i need to pull a more recent version? Thanks, and sorry for the basic questions, --dkg --------------enig19833F3FE96C87BA601B7529 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJO4lPsXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwRUU1QkU5NzkyODJEODBCOUY3NTQwRjFD Q0QyRUQ5NEQyMTczOUU5AAoJEMzS7ZTSFznp5Z4P/RXfL5XYDSneFQGJhgPDlcsu p77atan1OrMowYEB6yefQMtkZUbgMiljV7b4QvXX4d1yBemuhKahkO6xrlfApZ73 bKMWVW7NJDRgavWkxl0Ayvslhmshmru3nQNRMJKl/kkUrKwtMJMKvhT201oIf52j bA6L11DGHhR7C+tIoWvBCwHSlULU62s015ZL0HcVVYxtievxVB5ARlxCn4mwJ7G0 tAt4zEtvvRYxI/oELbgHtiM4cUDgNNtSA0XM4/mzdu3WUWMVQutgGA1FkONEg9tY bZFZQYqlTnDhFcEmRBpOERhevN9hRWmx9XR8zcQVd8OVyjzS1LcD2YONQ62PYBN0 INu7Ce+P3WCaImoMBrvnFdqzrgG3AJbuZ0oV56bXjJrqHfPlth1xFZ3bVUXbq3JI Tj0Ddh4p5c+tcXuoRu6X/pjDe1RPp3jB3Mlp8T+ZmBy8X7YgIXXi+RxBpssIgvaU 9V0XFd64zkl1WFo+8+dKTuWxoalhnZnegz7tVNVb66S8+aM9JzrBeBChITsSzVTW 7U9QJciGBkKL6RWjlzRaC5vHbv68OsW/A66IscGU/Xj7d/jFIm/nC7AbaDI6ExKn LpadJFhpw8+vTqY1qLHYS/7ODx8TWk789LimXo0O5dgX6Lds9Hm/o1tDAsrFSeXS MAHpLVVgkCAycDdlGiHL =ujh9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig19833F3FE96C87BA601B7529--