public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: "Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] RPCBIND: add anonymous listening socket in addition to named one
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:48:46 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EFC539E.4050008@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111228182213.GA10220@fieldses.org>

28.12.2011 22:22, bfields@fieldses.org пишет:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 07:17:30PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> I've experienced a problem with registering Lockd service with
>> rpcbind in container. My container operates in it's own network
>> namespace context and has it's own root. But on service register,
>> kernel tries to connect to named unix socket by using
>> rpciod_workqueue. Thus any connect is done with the same fs->root,
>
> There's no way to pass the correct context down to the rpc task and from
> there to the registration code?
>

This context is current->fs->root. It's used to lookup unix socket inode by name 
on connect.
Obviously, current is always "rpciod_workqueue" kernel thread. And thus has the 
same root.
The only solution how to pass and use the context, which I can see, is to expand 
sock_xprt with a pointer to corrent root and then set this root before 
kernel_connect() and set the old one after.
But this looks ugly and too complicated for the issue, from my pow.
Or maybe you have some more elegant solution to this problem?

-- 
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky

      reply	other threads:[~2011-12-29 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-28 15:17 [RFC] RPCBIND: add anonymous listening socket in addition to named one Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-28 17:03 ` Chuck Lever
2011-12-28 17:30   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-28 17:59     ` Chuck Lever
2011-12-29 11:48       ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-29 16:03         ` Chuck Lever
2011-12-29 16:12           ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-29 16:23             ` Chuck Lever
2011-12-29 17:04               ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-29 17:42               ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-01-25 11:12                 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-01-25 14:41                   ` bfields
2012-01-25 16:02                     ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-28 18:22 ` bfields
2011-12-29 11:48   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EFC539E.4050008@parallels.com \
    --to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox