From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
open-osd <osd-dev@open-osd.org>,
Benny Halevy <bhalevy@tonian.com>,
Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
Subject: [PATCHSET 0/2] pnfs-obj: Important BUG fixing also for @Stable
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 09:23:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F06A18E.4010706@panasas.com> (raw)
Hi Trond
I'm sending in two patches that fixes a bad hung, memory leak, a WARN_ON
and plain wrong protocol handling. In regard to objlayout error handling.
These are also aimed at Stable@ for the 3.2 Kernel.
(Actually these bugs are in since 3.0, I might produce another version
for 3.[1,0] after these go in)
I have simulated errors at various layers, reads and writes, in combination
of different tests, and they work as I expect. .i.e IO continues to MDS and
oblayout is returned on error.
Please include these patches for 3.3 and they can go to Stable@ for 3.2
has well.
list of patches:
[PATCH 1/2] pnfs-obj: pNFS errors are communicated on iodata->pnfs_error
This is just a stupidity and neglect. Benny can you understand
what happened here?
[PATCH 2/2] pnfs-obj: Must return layout on IO error
This patch is mainly for pnfs.c but I think it is very simple
and totally not affecting anybody but objlayout. So it should
be safe, and does fixes my main problem.
Fred please review?
Please Review
Thanks
Boaz
next reply other threads:[~2012-01-06 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-06 7:23 Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2012-01-06 7:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] pnfs-obj: pNFS errors are communicated on iodata->pnfs_error Boaz Harrosh
2012-01-06 7:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] pnfs-obj: Must return layout on IO error Boaz Harrosh
2012-01-09 8:09 ` [PATCHSET 0/2] pnfs-obj: Important BUG fixing also for @Stable Benny Halevy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F06A18E.4010706@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bhalevy@tonian.com \
--cc=iisaman@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).