From: Fu Liankun <fuliankun@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: spnfs write performance issue
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:16:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F44C071.8010104@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
When copy a big file(about 500MB) to nfs server using pnfs, it cost
obvious longer time as compared with NFSv3 or NFSv4 protocol.
PNFS cost about 300-550s
NFSv3 cost about 49s
NFSv4 cost about 49s
My test environment as following:
MDS: 3.1.0-rc8-pnfs ipaddr1: 192.168.0.100, ipaddr2:192.168.1.100
DS1: 3.1.0-rc8-pnfs ipaddr1: 192.168.0.101, ipaddr2:192.168.1.101
DS2: 3.1.0-rc8-pnfs ipaddr1: 192.168.0.102, ipaddr2:192.168.1.102
client: RHEL6.2GA(2.6.32-220.el6.i686) ipaddr1: 192.168.0.19,
ipaddr2:192.168.1.19
192.168.1.100 <-------- NFS4.1 connection --------->192.168.1.101
192.168.0.100 <-------- NFS4.1 connection --------->192.168.0.102
192.168.0.19 <-------- NFS4.1 connection --------->192.168.0.100
Dunring the write process, the client output the message:
FS-Cache: Loaded
FS-Cache: Netfs 'nfs' registered for caching
nfs4filelayout_init: NFSv4 File Layout Driver Registering...
nfs: server 192.168.1.101 not responding, timed out
The message "nfs: server 192.168.1.101 not responding, timed out" was
output during the COMMIT request.
Who can tell me the reason why pnfs cost so long time.
next reply other threads:[~2012-02-22 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-22 10:16 Fu Liankun [this message]
2012-02-22 17:25 ` spnfs write performance issue J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-27 6:27 ` Fu Liankun
2012-02-27 12:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-28 1:32 ` Fu Liankun
2012-02-28 1:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-28 1:48 ` Fu Liankun
2012-02-28 1:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-28 2:14 ` Fu Liankun
2012-02-28 9:27 ` Benny Halevy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F44C071.8010104@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=fuliankun@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).