From: steve <steve@steve-ss.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: POSIX acls over nfs4
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:19:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F489999.30909@steve-ss.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F466467.3030506@steve-ss.com>
On 23/02/12 17:08, steve wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 04:42 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>>> First, if you want an ace on a directory to be inherited by files and
>>>> directories created under that directory, make sure you're setting
>>>> the f
>>>> and d flags (see nfs4_getfacl -H).
>>>>
>>>> Second, there's a umask problem: posix acl inheritance overrides the
>>>> umask, but nfs4 acl inheritance isn't doing that. (The client combines
>>>> the create mode and the umask and sets both together, there's no way
>>>> for
>>>> the server to even tell what the umask is.)
>>>>
>>>> (We should do something about this if we can: maybe modifying the
>>>> client
>>>> to scan the directory acl for any inheritable aces and leaving out the
>>>> umask if they're found? It has the obvious race, but I seem to recall
>>>> we live with that in the v3 case. Or maybe there's something more
>>>> clever, but this comes up every now and then and I can't remember a
>>>> better solution.)
>>>>
Hi everyone
This really is a show stopper for us.
Would it be possible to give users the choice of being able to disable
nfs4 acls so we can fall back to POSIX or nt acls? Or at least until the
nfs4 team have had time to consider the situation?
Mounting with -o nofacl in the hope that the POSIX acl set on the
unmounted directory would take effect, seems to have no effect.
What I'm doing at the moment is scanning the unmounted directory every
few seconds using 'find' and changing the files to g+rw:-(
Thanks,
Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-25 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-18 20:08 POSIX acls over nfs4 steve
2012-02-19 17:15 ` steve
2012-02-23 7:15 ` steve
2012-02-23 8:33 ` tao.peng
2012-02-23 12:50 ` steve
2012-02-23 11:39 ` Jeff Layton
2012-02-23 11:53 ` steve
2012-02-23 14:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-23 15:33 ` steve
2012-02-23 15:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-23 16:08 ` steve
2012-02-25 8:19 ` steve [this message]
2012-02-28 20:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-28 23:22 ` steve
2012-02-29 12:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-29 14:04 ` steve
2012-02-29 14:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-29 14:26 ` steve
2012-02-29 14:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-29 14:40 ` steve
2012-03-01 20:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-01 22:11 ` steve
2012-03-02 18:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-28 20:00 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F489999.30909@steve-ss.com \
--to=steve@steve-ss.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).