From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: "Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@parallels.com>,
"neilb@suse.de" <neilb@suse.de>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
"bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"devel@openvz.org" <devel@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] NFS: release per-net clients lock before calling PipeFS dentries creation
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:20:46 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4BAD5E.9000600@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B6E7E@saturn3.aculab.com>
27.02.2012 19:59, David Laight пишет:
>
>> spin_lock(&nn->nfs_client_lock);
>> - list_for_each_entry(clp,&nn->nfs_client_list, cl_share_link) {
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(clp, tmp,&nn->nfs_client_list,
> cl_share_link) {
>> if (clp->rpc_ops !=&nfs_v4_clientops)
>> continue;
>> + atomic_inc(&clp->cl_count);
>> + spin_unlock(&nn->nfs_client_lock);
>> error = __rpc_pipefs_event(clp, event, sb);
>> + nfs_put_client(clp);
>> if (error)
>> break;
>> + spin_lock(&nn->nfs_client_lock);
>> }
>> spin_unlock(&nn->nfs_client_lock);
>> return error;
>
> The locking doesn't look right if the loop breaks on error.
> (Same applied to patch v2 1/4)
>
Thanks for the catch. I'll fix this.
> Although list_fo_each_entry_safe() allows the current entry
> to be freed, I don't believe it allows the 'next' to be freed.
> I doubt there is protection against that happening.
>
We need to use safe macro, because client can be destroyed on nfs_put_client() call.
About "protection against ... the 'next' to be freed" - I dont' think, that we
need any protection against it. This will be done under nfs_client_lock, and
current entry list pointers will be updated properly.
> Do you need to use an atomic_inc() for cl_count.
> I'd guess the nfs_client_lock is usually held?
>
Sorry, I don't understand this question.
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-27 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-27 15:50 [PATCH v2 0/4] SUNRPC: several fixes around PipeFS objects Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-02-27 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] SUNRPC: release per-net clients lock before calling PipeFS dentries creation Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-02-27 16:21 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-02-27 16:55 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-02-27 17:11 ` David Laight
2012-02-27 17:37 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-02-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] NFS: " Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-02-27 15:59 ` David Laight
2012-02-27 16:20 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]
2012-02-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] SUNRPC: check RPC inode's pipe reference before dereferencing Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-02-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] SUNRPC: move waitq from RPC pipe to RPC inode Stanislav Kinsbursky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4BAD5E.9000600@parallels.com \
--to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).