linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, <keyrings@linux-nfs.org>,
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	"Bhamare, Sachin" <sbhamare@panasas.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCHSET 0/4] kmod: Optional timeout on the wait in call_usermodehelper_exec
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:18:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F691059.30405@panasas.com> (raw)

Andrew Hi

I'm picking on you because I don't have any one else to pick on.
The 3 first patches here, are just good for today. Please see if
you would like to take them? or tell me who should take them?

The 4th patch is an RFC, which got me looking into this.

My motivation is that I added yet another Kernel dependency on the
call_usermodehelper() function and am not completely happy with the
error case of having the user-mode program stuck forever. In such
case I would like the Kernel part to timeout and properly error recover
and clean up. So therefor the proposed 4th patch.

It is still in RFC because it is only lightly tested. I have booted
with this patch and tested my use of it, with the new timeout. I have
also dprinted the new reference counting introduced, and it does not
look like we have any reference leaks.
Though I have not seen in dmesgs one of the three possible cases.

If the General Idea is acceptable and there is a chance this gets
accepted, I will conduct heavy unit testing of all the cases and
will resubmit the 4th patch.

So please review and tell me what you guys think.

[I have CCed all these that scripts/get_maintainers.pl suggested
 so sorry for the noise for some]

The list of patches:
[PATCH 1/4] kmod: Unexport call_usermodehelper_freeinfo()
[PATCH 2/4] kmod: kmod: Convert two call sites to call_usermodehelper_fns()
[PATCH 3/4] kmod: kmod: Move call_usermodehelper_fns() to .c file and unexport it's helpers
	
	These 3 are good cleanups, regardless of any new fixtures

[RFC 4/4] {RFC} kmod.c: Add new call_usermodehelper_timeout() API

	This patch is my motivation. Please review and comment on the
	new API, as well as the implementation details.

---
 fs/exec.c                   |    2 +-
 include/linux/kmod.h        |   47 +++++++++-----------------------
 kernel/kmod.c               |   62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/sys.c                |   11 +------
 security/keys/request_key.c |   13 ++-------
 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
---

Thanks
Boaz

             reply	other threads:[~2012-03-20 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-20 23:18 Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2012-03-20 23:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] kmod: Un-export call_usermodehelper_freeinfo() Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-20 23:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] kmod: Convert two call sites to call_usermodehelper_fns() Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-22  3:00   ` James Morris
2012-03-20 23:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] kmod: Move call_usermodehelper_fns() to .c file and unexport it's helpers Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-20 23:32 ` [RFC 4/4] {RFC} kmod.c: Add new call_usermodehelper_timeout() API Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-22  2:44   ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-22  2:48   ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-22  2:52     ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-22 11:48     ` [RFC 4/4] {RFC} kmod.c: Add new call_usermodehelper_timeout()API Tetsuo Handa
2012-03-22 14:27     ` [RFC 4/4] {RFC} kmod.c: Add new call_usermodehelper_timeout() API Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-22 14:42       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-22 19:08       ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-22 22:16         ` [RFC 4/4] {RFC} kmod.c: Add new call_usermodehelper_timeout()API Tetsuo Handa
2012-03-23  4:48           ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-23  5:23             ` Tetsuo Handa
2012-03-23 16:30             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-23 13:34         ` [RFC 4/4] {RFC} kmod.c: Add new call_usermodehelper_timeout() API Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-21 15:35 ` [PATCHSET 0/4] kmod: Optional timeout on the wait in call_usermodehelper_exec Greg KH
2012-03-22  0:18   ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-22  0:31     ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-03-22  1:18       ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-27  1:57 ` [PATCHSET 0/6 version 2] " Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-27  2:00   ` [PATCH 1/6] kmod: Unexport call_usermodehelper_freeinfo() Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-27  2:02   ` [PATCH 2/6] kmod: Convert two call sites to call_usermodehelper_fns() Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-27  2:04   ` [PATCH 3/6] kmod: Move call_usermodehelper_fns() to .c file and unexport all it's helpers Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-27  2:06   ` [PATCH 4/6 OPTION-A] completion: Add new wait_for_completion_timeout_state Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-27  2:33     ` [PATCH 4/6 OPTION-A version 3] " Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-27  8:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-28 18:19         ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-28 18:25           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-28 17:38       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-27  2:09   ` [PATCH 4/6 option-B] kmod: add new wait_for_completion_timeout_state() helper Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-27  2:13   ` [PATCH 5/6] kmod: Add new call_usermodehelper_timeout() API Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-27 15:43     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-28 17:04       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-27  2:15   ` [PATCH 6/6] kmod: optional: Convert the use of xchg to a kref Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-28 16:35     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-27 21:07   ` [PATCHSET 0/6 version 2] kmod: Optional timeout on the wait in call_usermodehelper_exec Andrew Morton
2012-03-28 20:19     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-28 21:42       ` Boaz Harrosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F691059.30405@panasas.com \
    --to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=keyrings@linux-nfs.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=sbhamare@panasas.com \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).