From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] nfsd/lockd: have locks_in_grace take a sb arg
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:24:52 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F85DA84.8010703@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120411182218.GB31025@fieldses.org>
11.04.2012 22:22, J. Bruce Fields написал:
>> > What would happen, if we will have situation like below:
>> >
>> > mountd A mountd B
>> >
>> > pid_ns pid_ns
>> > | |
>> > mnt_ns mnt_ns
>> > | |
>> > ----- net_ns ----
>> >
>> > Is it possible, BTW?
>> > It yes, that is such construction valid?
> Looks like a mess, no. I'd expect there to be only one rpc.mountd
> running per network namespace.
Then we have to prevent such situations somehow.
Or it is done already?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-11 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-03 12:14 [PATCH][RFC] nfsd/lockd: have locks_in_grace take a sb arg Jeff Layton
2012-04-09 23:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-04-10 11:13 ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-10 13:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-04-10 11:44 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-10 12:05 ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-10 12:18 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-10 12:16 ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-10 12:46 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-10 13:39 ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-10 14:52 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-10 18:45 ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-11 10:09 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-11 11:48 ` Jeff Layton
2012-04-11 13:08 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-11 17:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-04-11 17:37 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-11 18:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-04-11 19:24 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]
2012-04-11 22:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-04-12 9:05 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-10 20:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-04-11 10:34 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-11 17:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-04-11 17:33 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-11 17:40 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-11 18:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-04-11 19:39 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-04-11 19:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F85DA84.8010703@parallels.com \
--to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).