linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devel@openvz.org" <devel@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: init client before declaration
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 19:03:37 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBBAAC9.2090403@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337696984.4269.4.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>

On 22.05.2012 18:29, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:40 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> Client have to be initialized prior to adding it to per-net clients list,
>> because otherwise there are races, shown below:
>>
>> CPU#0					CPU#1
>> _____					_____
>>
>> nfs_get_client
>> nfs_alloc_client
>> list_add(..., nfs_client_list)
>> 					rpc_fill_super
>> 					rpc_pipefs_event
>> 					nfs_get_client_for_event
>> 					__rpc_pipefs_event
>> 					(clp->cl_rpcclient is uninitialized)
>> 					BUG()
>> init_client
>> clp->cl_rpcclient = ...
>>
>
> Why not simply change nfs_get_client_for_event() so that it doesn't
> touch nfs_clients that have clp->cl_cons_state!=NFS_CS_READY?
>
> That should ensure that it doesn't touch nfs_clients that failed to
> initialise and/or are still in the process of being initialised.
>

It looks like in this case we will have another races:

CPU#0						CPU#1
_____						_____

nfs4_init_client
nfs_idmap_new
nfs_idmap_register
rpc_get_sb_net (fail - no pipefs)
  					rpc_fill_super
  					rpc_pipefs_event
  					nfs_get_client_for_event
					(skip client - NFS_CS_READY is not set)
nfs_mark_client_ready(NFS_CS_READY)


And we are having client without idmap pipe...


> Cheers
>    Trond
>


-- 
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-22 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-22 12:40 [PATCH] NFS: init client before declaration Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-22 13:47 ` Chuck Lever
2012-05-22 14:29 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 15:00   ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 15:29     ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-22 15:51       ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 16:18         ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-22 16:43           ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 20:32             ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-23 11:30               ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-23 12:09                 ` Kinsbursky Stanislav
2012-05-23 13:57                 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-05-22 15:03   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FBBAAC9.2090403@parallels.com \
    --to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).