From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"bfields@redhat.com" <bfields@redhat.com>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] SUNRPC: Add RPC based upcall mechanism for RPCGSS auth
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 19:23:05 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBBAF59.5070000@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337699906.16840.192.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org>
On 22.05.2012 19:18, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 19:10 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> On 22.05.2012 18:58, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 17:32 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>>>> It actually means, that no hard-coded init_net references should appear - and
>>>> that's all. Required network context have to be taken from currently existent
>>>> objects (like RPC client, RPC service, etc) and, if not available (it's very
>>>> rare case - like NFS mount call), from current->nsproxy->net_ns.
>>>> You don't need to do anything special except this.
>>>> There will be a problem with your patches in container, because you are using
>>>> unix socket. But this problem is not in your patches but in unix sockets
>>>> themselves. So don't worry about it.
>>>
>>> Can you tell me if the attached patches are all you think is needed ?
>>> If they are, I'll squash them in with other fixes and will send out a
>>> new patch set.
>>>
>>
>> Yep, looks good.
>> Would be great, if you'll fix a couple of minor issues:
>> 1) rename "xprt_net" to "net" in prototypes (just to make things look in one
>> style with other places in SUNRPC layer)
>
> TBH, I thikn using 'net' is the worst name you guys could come up with,
> try to 'git grep net' to see what I mean, but whatever, the damage is
> already done, I'll change it.
>
The reason for the simple name was that we don't care, where we gained this net:
was it transport or whatever.
IOW, "xprt_net" doesn't carrying any required information comparing to "net" in
this case.
>> 2) define net variable on stack in svcauth_gss_proxy_init() (looks simpler):
>>
>> +static int svcauth_gss_proxy_init(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
>> + struct rpc_gss_wire_cred *gc, __be32 *authp)
>> ....
>> + struct net *net = rqstp->rq_xprt->xpt_net;
>> + struct sunrpc_net *sn = net_generic(net, sunrpc_net_id);
>> ....
>> + status = gssp_accept_sec_context_upcall(net,&ud);
>
> Heh, that is what I did at first, then changed. Works for me, I'll
> include these changes in the new patchset.
>
Thanks, Simo.
> Simo.
>
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-15 13:12 [PATCH 0/4] Add support for new upcall mechanism for nfsd Simo Sorce
2012-05-15 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] SUNRPC: conditionally return endtime from import_sec_context Simo Sorce
2012-05-21 21:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-15 13:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] SUNRPC: Document a bit RPCGSS handling in the NFS Server Simo Sorce
2012-05-21 21:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-22 0:37 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-15 13:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] SUNRPC: Add RPC based upcall mechanism for RPCGSS auth Simo Sorce
2012-05-22 12:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-22 13:00 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-22 13:17 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-22 13:22 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-22 13:32 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-22 14:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-22 14:44 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-22 15:07 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-22 15:16 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-22 15:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-22 15:44 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-22 15:19 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-22 18:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-22 18:41 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-22 14:58 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-22 15:10 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-22 15:18 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-22 15:23 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]
2012-05-22 13:00 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-05-22 15:02 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-22 15:15 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-22 15:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-22 15:40 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-22 22:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-22 22:52 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-22 15:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-22 15:12 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-22 15:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-22 15:36 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-15 13:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] SUNRPC: Use gssproxy upcall for nfsd's RPCGSS authentication Simo Sorce
2012-05-22 22:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-24 4:31 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-24 11:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-24 13:19 ` Simo Sorce
2012-05-25 14:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-05-25 15:37 ` Simo Sorce
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-25 22:09 [PATCH 0/4] Add support for new RPCSEC_GSS upcall mechanism for nfsd Simo Sorce
2012-05-25 22:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] SUNRPC: Add RPC based upcall mechanism for RPCGSS auth Simo Sorce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBBAF59.5070000@parallels.com \
--to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).