From: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS regression in v3.5-rc1: mount.nfs yells about incorrect mount option
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:28:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD21A32.8050400@netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120608134905.GX12795@8bytes.org>
On 06/08/2012 09:49 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:37:01AM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
>> On 06/08/2012 09:33 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>
>>> Your other patch only touched the nfs4 path, but in my setup nfs3 was in
>>> use. Therefore the patch didn't help. I just figured out that
>>> nfs_fs_mount is shared between nfs23 and nfs4, so the first patch
>>> probably breaks nfs4. I send another one which takes this into account.
>>
>> Would something like this work? (I haven't tried it yet). Setting it
>> in nfs_alloc_parsed_mount_data() might work too...
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
>> index bdd6731..906f09c 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
>> @@ -1867,6 +1867,7 @@ static int nfs23_validate_mount_data(void *options,
>> if (data == NULL)
>> goto out_no_data;
>>
>> + args->version = NFS_DEFAULT_VERSION;
>> switch (data->version) {
>> case 1:
>> data->namlen = 0;
>> --
>
> Yes, this works too (tested). Doing it in nfs_alloc_parsed_mount_data()
> need to take into account that the function is also called for nfs4.
> This is basically what my second revert-patch does.
Thanks for testing! The patch I sent you yesterday sets up "args->version = 4" if it gets into the v4 parsing code, so the v4 case should already be taken care of.
- Bryan
>
>
> Joerg
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-08 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-07 15:04 NFS regression in v3.5-rc1: mount.nfs yells about incorrect mount option Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:12 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 15:17 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 15:43 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:31 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:50 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 15:54 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 16:01 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-07 17:23 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-07 19:33 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-08 13:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-08 13:20 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-08 13:33 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-08 13:37 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-06-08 13:49 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-06-08 15:28 ` Bryan Schumaker [this message]
2012-06-08 13:30 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD21A32.8050400@netapp.com \
--to=bjschuma@netapp.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).