linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] NFSd: fix locking in nfsd_forget_delegations()
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:02:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFEF51E.2060809@netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120712154331.GC21577@fieldses.org>

On 07/12/2012 11:43 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 06:38:50PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> v2: dl_recall_lru list is used for delegations collect because it's modified
>> both in unhash_delegation() and nfsd_break_one_deleg().
>>
>> This patch adds recall_lock hold to nfsd_forget_delegations() to protect
>> nfsd_process_n_delegations() call.
>> Also, looks like it would be better to collect delegations to some local
>> on-stack list, and then unhash collected list. This split allows to
>> simplify locking, because delegation traversing is protected by recall_lock,
>> when delegation unhash is protected by client_mutex.
> 
> Thanks, applying for 3.6 (assuming Bryan doesn't have any objection).

Nope, I don't have any objections.

- Bryan

> 
> --b.
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++----
>>  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> index 21266c7..3d6848b 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> @@ -4694,7 +4694,7 @@ void nfsd_forget_openowners(u64 num)
>>  	printk(KERN_INFO "NFSD: Forgot %d open owners", count);
>>  }
>>  
>> -int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, void (*deleg_func)(struct nfs4_delegation *))
>> +int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, struct list_head *list)
>>  {
>>  	int i, count = 0;
>>  	struct nfs4_file *fp, *fnext;
>> @@ -4703,7 +4703,7 @@ int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, void (*deleg_func)(struct nfs4_delegatio
>>  	for (i = 0; i < FILE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
>>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(fp, fnext, &file_hashtbl[i], fi_hash) {
>>  			list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, dnext, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) {
>> -				deleg_func(dp);
>> +				list_move(&dp->dl_recall_lru, list);
>>  				if (++count == num)
>>  					return count;
>>  			}
>> @@ -4716,9 +4716,16 @@ int nfsd_process_n_delegations(u64 num, void (*deleg_func)(struct nfs4_delegatio
>>  void nfsd_forget_delegations(u64 num)
>>  {
>>  	unsigned int count;
>> +	LIST_HEAD(victims);
>> +	struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *dnext;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock(&recall_lock);
>> +	count = nfsd_process_n_delegations(num, &victims);
>> +	spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
>>  
>>  	nfs4_lock_state();
>> -	count = nfsd_process_n_delegations(num, unhash_delegation);
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, dnext, &victims, dl_recall_lru)
>> +		unhash_delegation(dp);
>>  	nfs4_unlock_state();
>>  
>>  	printk(KERN_INFO "NFSD: Forgot %d delegations", count);
>> @@ -4727,10 +4734,16 @@ void nfsd_forget_delegations(u64 num)
>>  void nfsd_recall_delegations(u64 num)
>>  {
>>  	unsigned int count;
>> +	LIST_HEAD(victims);
>> +	struct nfs4_delegation *dp, *dnext;
>>  
>>  	nfs4_lock_state();
>>  	spin_lock(&recall_lock);
>> -	count = nfsd_process_n_delegations(num, nfsd_break_one_deleg);
>> +	count = nfsd_process_n_delegations(num, &victims);
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, dnext, &victims, dl_recall_lru) {
>> +		list_del(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
>> +		nfsd_break_one_deleg(dp);
>> +	}
>>  	spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
>>  	nfs4_unlock_state();
>>  
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



      reply	other threads:[~2012-07-12 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-25 14:38 [PATCH v2] NFSd: fix locking in nfsd_forget_delegations() Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-07-12 15:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-07-12 16:02   ` Bryan Schumaker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FFEF51E.2060809@netapp.com \
    --to=bjschuma@netapp.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).