Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
	Misbah Anjum N <misanjum@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Cc: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] SUNRPC: Address remaining cache_check_rcu() UAF in cache content files
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 10:45:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4bb9ed6b-1a64-406a-9239-b0560ca963cc@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76a10e49-54a6-4813-8b58-b7cd0820fdc6@app.fastmail.com>

Hello  Chuck,

在 2026/5/8 0:12, Chuck Lever 写道:
> Hello Erkun -
> 
> On Thu, May 7, 2026, at 11:09 AM, yangerkun wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 在 2026/5/1 22:51, Chuck Lever 写道:
>>> Misbah Anjum reported a use-after-free in cache_check_rcu()
>>> reached through e_show() while sosreport was reading
>>> /proc/fs/nfsd/exports on ppc64le.  Two fixes for that report
>>> landed in v7.0:
>>>
>>>     48db892356d6 ("NFSD: Defer sub-object cleanup in export put callbacks")
>>>     e7fcf179b82d ("NFSD: Hold net reference for the lifetime of /proc/fs/nfs/exports fd")
>>
>> Back to the problem fixed by this patches, I'm a little confused why
>> this UAF can be trigged.
>>
>> Before this patches, svc_export_put show as follow:
>>
>>    368 static void svc_export_put(struct kref *ref)
>>    369 {
>>    370         struct svc_export *exp = container_of(ref, struct
>> svc_export, h.ref);
>>    371
>>    372         path_put(&exp->ex_path);
>>    373         auth_domain_put(exp->ex_client);
>>    374         call_rcu(&exp->ex_rcu, svc_export_release);
>>    375 }
>>
>> The auth_domain_put function releases ->name using call_rcu, and
>> path_put may release the dentry also via call_rcu. All of this seems to
>> prevent e_show from causing a UAF. Could you point out which line in
>> d_path triggers the issue?
> 
> The dentry, the mount, and the auth_domain ->name buffer all
> end up RCU-freed (dentry_free() and delayed_free_vfsmnt in
> fs/, svcauth_unix_domain_release_rcu() in svcauth_unix.c).
> The eventual kfree isn't the problem.
> 
> The problem is the synchronous teardown inside path_put(),
> which runs before svc_export_put() ever reaches its own
> call_rcu():
> 
>    path_put(&exp->ex_path)
>      -> dput(dentry)
>         -> __dentry_kill()              [if last ref]
>            -> __d_drop()                /* unhashes */
>            -> dentry_unlink_inode()     /* d_inode = NULL */
>            -> d_op->d_release() if set
>            -> drops parent d_lockref    /* may cascade up */
>            -> dentry_free()             /* call_rcu deferred */
>      -> mntput(mnt)                     /* deferred via task_work */
> 
> The dentry pointer itself is RCU-safe, so prepend_path()'s walk
> of d_parent and d_name doesn't read freed memory.  But by the
> time the reader gets there, __d_clear_type_and_inode() has
> already stored NULL into d_inode, __d_drop() has broken the
> hash linkage, and the parent's d_lockref has been decremented
> -- which can in turn fire __dentry_kill() on the parent, and
> on up the tree.  An e_show() that's still inside its cache RCU
> read section walks into that half-dismantled state through
> seq_path(), and that's the NULL deref Misbah reported.

Thank you for your detailed explanation! Yes, e_show might be called 
when the state is partially dismantled, but after carefully reviewing 
the code with dput up to __dentry_kill, I still cannot find anything 
that could cause this issue. Additionally, the comments for prepend_path 
indicate that they have already taken into account that the dentry can 
be removed concurrently. I have also run some tests on my arm64 QEMU, 
but I couldn't reproduce the problem either. Could you please help me 
identify the specific line or pointer in the dentry that triggers this 
use-after-free or null pointer issue?

Maybe I am not be very familiar with the code, which caused me to fail 
to identify the real root cause. I'm so sorry for that.


265 char *d_path(const struct path *path, char *buf, int buflen)
266 {
267         DECLARE_BUFFER(b, buf, buflen);
268         struct path root;
269
270         /*
271          * We have various synthetic filesystems that never get 
mounted.  On
272          * these filesystems dentries are never used for lookup 
purposes, and
273          * thus don't need to be hashed.  They also don't need a 
name until a
274          * user wants to identify the object in /proc/pid/fd/.  The 
little hack
275          * below allows us to generate a name for these objects on 
demand:
276          *
277          * Some pseudo inodes are mountable.  When they are mounted
278          * path->dentry == path->mnt->mnt_root.  In that case don't 
call d_dname
279          * and instead have d_path return the mounted path.
280          */
281         if (path->dentry->d_op && path->dentry->d_op->d_dname &&
282             (!IS_ROOT(path->dentry) || path->dentry != 
path->mnt->mnt_root))
283                 return path->dentry->d_op->d_dname(path->dentry, 
buf, buflen);
284
285         rcu_read_lock();
286         get_fs_root_rcu(current->fs, &root);
287         if (unlikely(d_unlinked(path->dentry)))
288                 prepend(&b, " (deleted)", 11);
289         else
290                 prepend_char(&b, 0);
291         prepend_path(path, &root, &b);
292         rcu_read_unlock();
293
294         return extract_string(&b);
295 }


> 
> The earlier fix (2530766492ec, "nfsd: fix UAF when access
> ex_uuid or ex_stats") moved the kfree of ex_uuid and ex_stats
> into svc_export_release() so those are RCU-safe now.
> path_put() and auth_domain_put() couldn't go in there because
> both may sleep, and call_rcu callbacks run in softirq context.
> This series uses queue_rcu_work() instead: it defers past the
> grace period AND runs the callback in process context, so the
> sleeping puts move into the deferred path and the window
> closes.

Yeah, I can get this! Thanks again for your detail explanation!

Thanks,
Erkun.

> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-08  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-01 14:51 [PATCH 0/6] SUNRPC: Address remaining cache_check_rcu() UAF in cache content files Chuck Lever
2026-05-01 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] SUNRPC: Move cache_initialize() declaration to sunrpc-private header Chuck Lever
2026-05-01 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/6] SUNRPC: Provide a shared workqueue for cache release callbacks Chuck Lever
2026-05-01 14:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] SUNRPC: Defer ip_map sub-object cleanup past RCU grace period Chuck Lever
2026-05-01 14:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] SUNRPC: Use shared release pattern for the unix_gid cache Chuck Lever
2026-05-01 14:51 ` [PATCH 5/6] SUNRPC: Hold cd->net for the lifetime of cache files Chuck Lever
2026-05-01 14:51 ` [PATCH 6/6] NFSD: Convert nfsd_export_shutdown() to sunrpc_cache_destroy_net() Chuck Lever
2026-05-05  5:32 ` [PATCH 0/6] SUNRPC: Address remaining cache_check_rcu() UAF in cache content files Jeff Layton
2026-05-05 10:49 ` Calum Mackay
2026-05-05 10:53   ` Chuck Lever
2026-05-07  9:09 ` yangerkun
2026-05-07 16:12   ` Chuck Lever
2026-05-08  2:45     ` yangerkun [this message]
2026-05-08  3:08       ` yangerkun
2026-05-08  8:16         ` yangerkun
2026-05-08 13:00           ` yangerkun
2026-05-08 20:47             ` Chuck Lever
2026-05-09  9:41               ` yangerkun
2026-05-10 16:18                 ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4bb9ed6b-1a64-406a-9239-b0560ca963cc@huawei.com \
    --to=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=misanjum@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox