From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
To: "tom@talpey.com" <tom@talpey.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"chuck.lever@oracle.com" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"lilingfeng3@huawei.com" <lilingfeng3@huawei.com>,
"okorniev@redhat.com" <okorniev@redhat.com>,
"anna@kernel.org" <anna@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Dai.Ngo@oracle.com" <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>,
"yangerkun@huawei.com" <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
"jlayton@kernel.org" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"neilb@suse.de" <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: "houtao1@huawei.com" <houtao1@huawei.com>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"yi.zhang@huawei.com" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lilingfeng@huaweicloud.com" <lilingfeng@huaweicloud.com>,
"yukuai1@huaweicloud.com" <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Set tk_rpc_status when RPC_TASK_SIGNALLED is detected
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 03:15:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d3e8d4385a511860ec9018b3ca864e7ef3a7b48.camel@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58bf9d83-b58d-e5a6-4096-64eb96f3854a@huawei.com>
On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 10:29 +0800, yangerkun wrote:
>
>
> 在 2025/1/17 4:52, Trond Myklebust 写道:
> > On Thu, 2025-01-16 at 19:43 +0800, yangerkun wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the patch.
> > >
> > > Before 39494194f93b("SUNRPC: Fix races with rpc_killall_tasks()",
> > > every
> > > time we set RPC_TASK_SIGNALLED, when we go through __rpc_execute,
> > > this
> > > rpc_task will immediate break and exist.
> > >
> > > However after that, __rpc_execute won't judge RPC_TASK_SIGNNALED,
> > > so
> > > for
> > > the case like you point out below, even after your commit
> > > rpc_check_timeout will help break and exist eventually, but this
> > > rpc_task has already do some work. I prefer reintroduce judging
> > > RPC_TASK_SIGNNALED in __rpc_execute to help exist immediatly.
> > >
> >
> > Better yet... Let's get rid of the RPC_TASK_SIGNALLED flag
> > altogether
> > and just replace
> >
> > #define RPC_TASK_SIGNALLED(task) (READ_ONCE(task->tk_rpc_status) ==
> > -ERESTARTSYS)
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your reply! Yeah, if all the places where tk_rpc_status is
> updated are by calling rpc_task_set_rpc_status, we can use
> task->tk_rpc_status == -ERESTARTSYS to determine whether rpc_task is
> RPC_TASK_SIGNALLED. But for the case like Li has provided,
> __rpc_restart_call won't do this, and will overwrite tk_rpc_status
> unconditionally. This won't be a stable solution. Maybe it's better
> to
> change __rpc_restart_call calling rpc_task_set_rpc_status too? And
> __rpc_execute will be enough to help solve this case.
>
>
That would break __rpc_restart_call() to the point of rendering it
completely useless.
The whole purpose of that call is to give the NFS layer a chance to
handle errors in the exit callback, and then kick off a fresh call.
Your suggestion would mean that any RPC level error sticks around, and
causes the new call to immediately fail.
I see no point in doing anything more than fixing the looping
behaviour. Eliminating the redundant flag will do that.
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-17 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-14 14:41 [PATCH] SUNRPC: Set tk_rpc_status when RPC_TASK_SIGNALLED is detected Li Lingfeng
2025-01-16 11:43 ` yangerkun
2025-01-16 14:32 ` Li Lingfeng
2025-01-16 20:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2025-01-17 2:29 ` yangerkun
2025-01-17 3:15 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2025-01-17 12:16 ` yangerkun
2025-01-26 2:20 ` Li Lingfeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d3e8d4385a511860ec9018b3ca864e7ef3a7b48.camel@hammerspace.com \
--to=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lilingfeng3@huawei.com \
--cc=lilingfeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox