linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: "Schumaker, Bryan" <Bryan.Schumaker@netapp.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
	<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [nfs:devel 46/51] fs/nfs/write.c:1592:5: error: redefinition of 'nfs_commit_inode'
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:05:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5017D824.209@netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343739299.519.1.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>

On 07/31/2012 08:55 AM, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 08:47 -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
>> On 07/30/2012 11:14 PM, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
>>> Bryan,
>>>
>>> Why did you switch to using IS_ENABLED in the first place, and why wasn't that put in a separate patch?
>>
>> IS_ENABLED() will check for CONFIG_NFS_V*_MODULE, last I checked the defined() macro doesn't.  Putting this into a separate patch makes the change non-bisectable since gcc will be checking against CONFIG_NFS_V3 but CONFIG_NFS_V3_MODULE is set.  Should I have changed the CONFIG_ variables instead of using IS_ENABLED()?
> 
> Why is it evaluating differently in the include file vs. the .c file?
> Are we missing an include in nfs_fs.h?

Good question.  I don't see any reason that it would evaluate differently, but I'm compiling the .config attached to the initial email to try to figure it out.

- Bryan

> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Fengguang Wu [mailto:fengguang.wu@intel.com]
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 10:43 PM
>>>> To: Schumaker, Bryan
>>>> Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; Myklebust, Trond; linux-
>>>> nfs@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Subject: [nfs:devel 46/51] fs/nfs/write.c:1592:5: error: redefinition of
>>>> 'nfs_commit_inode'
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bryan,
>>>>
>>>> Kernel build failed on
>>>>
>>>> tree:   git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs.git devel
>>>> head:   5c13c9e1c15ee2ca9ab2b953224001af53d9be09
>>>> commit: 1c606fb74c758beafd98cbad9a9133eadeec2371 [46/51] NFS: Convert
>>>> v3 into a module
>>>> config: blackfin-BF533-EZKIT_defconfig (attached as .config)
>>>>
>>>> All related error/warning messages:
>>>>
>>>> fs/nfs/write.c:1592:5: error: redefinition of 'nfs_commit_inode'
>>>> In file included from fs/nfs/write.c:19:0:
>>>> include/linux/nfs_fs.h:547:1: note: previous definition of 'nfs_commit_inode'
>>>> was here
>>>>
>>>> vim +1592 fs/nfs/write.c
>>>>   1589		return status;
>>>>   1590	}
>>>>   1591
>>>>> 1592	int nfs_commit_inode(struct inode *inode, int how)
>>>>   1593	{
>>>>   1594		LIST_HEAD(head);
>>>>   1595		struct nfs_commit_info cinfo;
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> 0-DAY kernel build testing backend         Open Source Technology Centre
>>>> Fengguang Wu <wfg@linux.intel.com>                     Intel Corporation
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-31 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-31  2:43 [nfs:devel 46/51] fs/nfs/write.c:1592:5: error: redefinition of 'nfs_commit_inode' Fengguang Wu
2012-07-31  3:14 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-07-31 12:47   ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-07-31 12:55     ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-07-31 13:05       ` Bryan Schumaker [this message]
2012-07-31 13:30         ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-07-31 13:33           ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-07-31 13:44             ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-07-31 13:51               ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-31 13:55                 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-07-31 14:16                   ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-31 14:18                     ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-07-31 13:58               ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-07-31 14:08                 ` Bryan Schumaker
2012-07-31 14:10                 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-31 14:28                   ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-07-31 14:36                     ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5017D824.209@netapp.com \
    --to=bjschuma@netapp.com \
    --cc=Bryan.Schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).