From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] nfsd: don't call functions with side-effecting inside WARN_ON()
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 08:00:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <501e4bf7951c88322c675923ca54ad2b544cae47.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231124002504.19515-3-neilb@suse.de>
On Fri, 2023-11-24 at 11:23 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> Code like:
>
> WARN_ON(foo())
>
> looks like an assertion and might not be expected to have any side
> effects.
> When testing if a function with side-effects fails a construct like
>
> if (foo())
> WARN_ON(1);
>
> makes the intent more obvious.
>
> nfsd has several WARN_ON calls where the test has side effects, so it
> would be good to change them. These cases don't really need the
> WARN_ON. They have never failed in 8 years of usage so let's just
> remove the WARN_ON wrapper.
>
> Suggested-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 042c7a50f425..dd01d0b9e21e 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -1605,7 +1605,7 @@ static void release_open_stateid_locks(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *open_stp,
> while (!list_empty(&open_stp->st_locks)) {
> stp = list_entry(open_stp->st_locks.next,
> struct nfs4_ol_stateid, st_locks);
> - WARN_ON(!unhash_lock_stateid(stp));
> + unhash_lock_stateid(stp);
> put_ol_stateid_locked(stp, reaplist);
> }
> }
> @@ -2234,7 +2234,7 @@ __destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
> spin_lock(&state_lock);
> while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_delegations)) {
> dp = list_entry(clp->cl_delegations.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_perclnt);
> - WARN_ON(!unhash_delegation_locked(dp));
> + unhash_delegation_locked(dp);
> list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> }
> spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> @@ -6234,7 +6234,7 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> dp = list_entry (pos, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
> if (!state_expired(<, dp->dl_time))
> break;
> - WARN_ON(!unhash_delegation_locked(dp));
> + unhash_delegation_locked(dp);
> list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> }
> spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> @@ -8060,7 +8060,7 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> stp = list_first_entry(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids,
> struct nfs4_ol_stateid,
> st_perstateowner);
> - WARN_ON(!unhash_lock_stateid(stp));
> + unhash_lock_stateid(stp);
> put_ol_stateid_locked(stp, &reaplist);
> }
> spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> @@ -8353,7 +8353,7 @@ nfs4_state_shutdown_net(struct net *net)
> spin_lock(&state_lock);
> list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &nn->del_recall_lru) {
> dp = list_entry (pos, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
> - WARN_ON(!unhash_delegation_locked(dp));
> + unhash_delegation_locked(dp);
> list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> }
> spin_unlock(&state_lock);
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-27 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-24 0:23 [PATCH 00/11 v4] nfsd: support admin-revocation of v4 state NeilBrown
2023-11-24 0:23 ` [PATCH 01/11] nfsd: hold ->cl_lock for hash_delegation_locked() NeilBrown
2023-11-24 0:23 ` [PATCH 02/11] nfsd: don't call functions with side-effecting inside WARN_ON() NeilBrown
2023-11-27 13:00 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-11-24 0:23 ` [PATCH 03/11] nfsd: avoid race after unhash_delegation_locked() NeilBrown
2023-11-24 0:23 ` [PATCH 04/11] nfsd: split sc_status out of sc_type NeilBrown
2023-11-27 13:17 ` Jeff Layton
2023-11-24 0:23 ` [PATCH 05/11] nfsd: prepare for supporting admin-revocation of state NeilBrown
2023-11-24 0:23 ` [PATCH 06/11] nfsd: allow admin-revoked state to appear in /proc/fs/nfsd/clients/*/states NeilBrown
2023-11-24 0:23 ` [PATCH 07/11] nfsd: allow admin-revoked NFSv4.0 state to be freed NeilBrown
2023-11-24 0:23 ` [PATCH 08/11] nfsd: allow lock state ids to be revoked and then freed NeilBrown
2023-11-24 0:23 ` [PATCH 09/11] nfsd: allow open " NeilBrown
2023-11-24 0:23 ` [PATCH 10/11] nfsd: allow delegation " NeilBrown
2023-11-24 0:23 ` [PATCH 11/11] nfsd: allow layout state to be admin-revoked NeilBrown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-11-24 0:28 [PATCH 00/11 v4] nfsd: support admin-revocation of v4 state NeilBrown
2023-11-24 0:28 ` [PATCH 02/11] nfsd: don't call functions with side-effecting inside WARN_ON() NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=501e4bf7951c88322c675923ca54ad2b544cae47.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=kolga@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox