linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Diego Moreno <Diego.Moreno-Lazaro@bull.net>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: NFSv3 caching vs NFSv4
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:40:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50474858.1020801@bull.net> (raw)

Hello everyone,

Performing some attribute caching tests I think I found some 
inconsistencies between nfsv3 and nfsv4. Running a kernel based on 
rhel6.3 (2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64) I found nfsv4 doesn't manage a file 
modified on the server side (even with the noac mount option) while 
nfsv3 does.

My test will be modifying a file every second on the server mount point:

[root@nfs ~]#  FILE=/tmp/nfs_server/myfile ;  while true ; do sleep 1 ; 
sed -i 's/text1/text2/g' $FILE ; cat $FILE ; sleep 1; sed -i 
's/text2/text1/g' $FILE ; cat $FILE ; done
text2
text1
text2
text1
text2
(and so on...)

Meanwhile, the client (which BTW is the same machine) will read the file 
every second :

With NFSv4:

[root@nfs ~]# mount -o noac,vers=4 nfs:/tmp/nfs_server/ /tmp/nfs_client/
[root@nfs ~]# for i in 1 2 3 4 5 ; do cat /tmp/nfs_client/myfile; sleep 
1 ; done
text2
text1
text1
text1
text1

With NFSv3:
[root@nfs ~]# mount -o noac,vers=3 nfs:/tmp/nfs_server/ /tmp/nfs_client/
[root@nfs ~]# for i in 1 2 3 4 5 ; do cat /tmp/nfs_client/myfile; sleep 
1 ; done
text1
text2
text1
text2
text1

I can see in the tcpdump traces how the new change attribute and the 
FATTR4_TIME_MODIFY attributes are well received but it's as if the nfs 
client were ignoring these changes. I've been searching in the NFS list 
but I didn't find anything similar. Is this a bug or just a normal 
behavior? Sorry if it has been already pointed out.

Regards,

Diego Moreno

             reply	other threads:[~2012-09-05 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-05 12:40 Diego Moreno [this message]
2012-09-05 14:49 ` NFSv3 caching vs NFSv4 Myklebust, Trond
2012-09-05 17:21   ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-09-06  8:17     ` Diego Moreno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50474858.1020801@bull.net \
    --to=diego.moreno-lazaro@bull.net \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).