From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from relay.parallels.com ([195.214.232.42]:35820 "EHLO relay.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753863Ab2IQKuG convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 06:50:06 -0400 Message-ID: <50570052.8050205@parallels.com> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:49:54 +0400 From: Stanislav Kinsbursky MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Lever CC: "Myklebust, Trond" , "bfields@fieldses.org" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "devel@openvz.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "jlayton@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] lockd: use per-net refrence-counted NSM clients References: <20120914140811.10835.81465.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <4030B8F9-5C67-4AE7-826E-B4B6AD4FAD01@oracle.com> <4FA345DA4F4AE44899BD2B03EEEC2FA908FA7F55@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 14.09.2012 23:10, Chuck Lever пишет: > > On Sep 14, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Myklebust, Trond wrote: > >> On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 13:01 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: >>> What happens if statd is restarted? >> >> Nothing unusual. Why? > > The NSM upcall transport is a potential application for TCP + softconn, now that a persistent rpc_clnt is used. It just depends on what failure mode we'd like to optimize for. > I don't understand, where the problem is. Could you be more specific, please? -- Best regards, Stanislav Kinsbursky