From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2] mount: Added the -o v4.1 mount option
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:40:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AAA75E.70703@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA345DA4F4AE44899BD2B03EEEC2FA9092EF4AA@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
On 19/11/12 13:29, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> Note that the mount command should in any case not be relying on rpcbind
> to decide whether or not the server supports NFSv4.
Of course....
>
> As for minor version negotiation, RFC3530 already tells you how to do
> this: the client has to start with the highest version that it supports,
> and then walk that number down until the server stops replying with
> NFS4ERR_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH.
Perfect... I think we should do *all* v4 negotiation from the mount
command... It's so much acceptable to replace mount.nfs binaries
than kernels...
>
> Note that if you want to do this in userland before calling the mount
> syscall, then the spec does allow you to "ping" the NFSv4 server with an
> empty COMPOUND.
The type of functionality will allow us to better deal with legacy servers, IMHO..
steved.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-19 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-19 15:43 [RFC PATCH V2] mount: Added the -o v4.1 mount option Steve Dickson
2012-11-19 15:54 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-19 15:58 ` Steve Dickson
2012-11-19 16:02 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-19 16:14 ` Steve Dickson
2012-11-19 16:24 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-19 18:11 ` Chuck Lever
2012-11-19 18:29 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-19 18:39 ` Chuck Lever
2012-11-19 19:04 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-19 21:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-19 21:40 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2012-11-19 18:21 ` Chuck Lever
2012-11-19 21:51 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50AAA75E.70703@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).