From: fanchaoting <fanchaoting@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"\"fa >> 范朝挺\"" <fanchaoting@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: nfs cache bug (when server delete the file ,nfs client can read file also)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:00:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AF10ED.3070208@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA345DA4F4AE44899BD2B03EEEC2FA9092F7F85@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4144 bytes --]
Myklebust, Trond 写道:
> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 13:23 +0800, fanchaoting wrote:
>> Myklebust, Trond 写道:
>>> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 12:18 +0800, fanchaoting wrote:
>>>> Hi,everyone. I found a big bug abount nfs cache.
>>>>
>>>> when server delete the file ,nfs client can read file also.
>>>>
>>>> the following is the reproduce.
>>>>
>>>> ip: 192.168.0.19 nfs-client
>>>> ip: 192.168.0.20 nfs-client
>>>> ip: 192.168.0.21 nfs-server
>>>>
>>>> ############################################################################
>>>>
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.21 service nfs start
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.21 /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.19 /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.20 /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.21 "rm -rf /nfsroot; mkdir -p /nfsroot"
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.21 /usr/sbin/exportfs -au
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.21 /usr/sbin/exportfs -i -o insecure,no_root_squash,rw,fsid=0 *:/nfsroot
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.19 test -d /nfsroot || (rm -rf /nfsroot; mkdir -p /nfsroot)
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.20 test -d /nfsroot || (rm -rf /nfsroot; mkdir -p /nfsroot)
>>>>
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.19 umount /nfsroot
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.20 umount /nfsroot
>>>> cmd="echo \"hello world\" > /nfsroot/tmpfile"
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.21 $cmd
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.21 mkdir /nfsroot/tmpdir
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.21 touch /nfsroot/tmpdir/tmpdfile
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.19 mount -t nfs4 192.168.0.21:/ /nfsroot
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.20 mount -t nfs4 192.168.0.21:/ /nfsroot
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.21 cat /nfsroot/tmpfile
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.21 ls -l /nfsroot/tmpdir
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.19 cat /nfsroot/tmpfile
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.19 ls -l /nfsroot/tmpdir
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.20 cat /nfsroot/tmpfile
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.20 ls -l /nfsroot/tmpdir
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.19 cat /nfsroot/tmpfile > /dev/null
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.20 cat /nfsroot/tmpfile > /dev/null
>>>> /usr/bin/ssh -n 192.168.0.21 rm -rf /nfsroot/tmpfile
>>>> echo -e "sleep 60~~~~~~~~\n"
>>>> sleep 60
>>>>
>>>> #############################################################################
>>>>
>>>> last: In 192.168.0.19 I do:
>>>>
>>>> #cat /nfsroot/tmpfile <--the nfs server delete the file,but nfs client can read the file
>>>> hello world
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think when the nfs server delete the file ,
>>>> the server should notice the nfs client,
>>>> but the upstream kernel does't this.
>>> So is this a problem with the client or the server? In other words, if
>>> you use a different server/client combination, do you see a different
>>> result?
>>>
>> I think that the server has the problem .when the server deletes the file ,
>> it should notice the client immediately.
>
> There is no notification mechanism in NFS; on open(), the client is
> supposed to revalidate its cached information and the server is supposed
> to return an ESTALE error if the filehandle is no longer valid. Either
> one of these 2 mechanisms (client revalidation or server reply) could be
> going wrong here, which is why I'm asking.
I found J. Bruce Fields's patch(break delegations on unlink) maybe solve this problem .
But I did't found it in the upstream kernel.
I think when the server delete the file, it should reply a DELEGRETURN to the nfs client.
>
>>> Which kernels are you using in your tests for the client and server?
>>>
>> I found the problem in kernel 3.7.0-rc6
>
> OK. Do you have a non-Linux server or client available that you can use
> for testing? Alternatively, could you use wireshark to capture a dump of
> the NFS traffic between the client and server?
In the wireshark, I found the right traffic should have open operation,
but now i can't find the open operation.
I found the function nfs4_open_prepare has problem , in the old kernel ,
it can run
...snip...
rpc_call_start(task);
...snip...
>
[-- Attachment #2: nfscache_cache_wrong.dump --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1484 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: nfscache_cache_right.dump --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1100 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-23 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-23 4:18 nfs cache bug (when server delete the file ,nfs client can read file also) fanchaoting
2012-11-23 5:11 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-23 5:23 ` fanchaoting
2012-11-23 5:36 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-11-23 6:00 ` fanchaoting [this message]
2012-11-23 17:20 ` bfields
2012-11-26 5:41 ` fanchaoting
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-23 4:32 fanchaoting
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50AF10ED.3070208@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=fanchaoting@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).