From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mountd: handle allocation failures in auth_unix_ip upcall"
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:23:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B4CCFD.6010900@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121126225116.GE18186@fieldses.org>
Hello,
On 26/11/12 17:51, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> What exactly is the problem with the current code?
>> >
>> > client_resolve() can return a NULL in some cases. Why is it OK to
>> > pass a NULL "ai" to client_compose() ? Looks like that can result in
>> > a mountd segfault.
> Bah, I thought I'd checked this and found it was prepared to handle
> that, but no:
>
> client_check->check_wildcard()
>
> looks like it can oops.
Yeah... added client_check->check_netgroup() to this list...
>
> OK, I'll take another look.
A simply check that ai is not null when calling client_compose() should work..
>
>> > The kernel won't get any downcall reply in that
>> > case! Is that what you are trying to fix?
>> >
>> > WRT my original objection: In general I don't see how to make it
>> > impossible for mountd to fail.
> Sure, but mountd is required for the server to function, so it's just a
> question of how we fail.
>
>> > Thus the kernel needs to be better about recovering when mountd
>> > suddenly disappears.
> Currently it drops and lets the client retry. I suspect that's the
> correct thing to do, but alternatives are welcomed.
This one things I didn't see happen... the client retrying... expected it would...
steved.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-27 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-26 22:03 [PATCH] Revert "mountd: handle allocation failures in auth_unix_ip upcall" J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-26 22:05 ` Chuck Lever
2012-11-26 22:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-26 22:38 ` Chuck Lever
2012-11-26 22:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-26 23:10 ` Chuck Lever
2012-11-27 14:23 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2012-11-27 21:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-11-27 21:33 ` Chuck Lever
2012-11-28 14:39 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B4CCFD.6010900@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).