From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from relay.parallels.com ([195.214.232.42]:48477 "EHLO relay.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754850Ab3AKO5D (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:57:03 -0500 Message-ID: <50F0283A.6040509@parallels.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:56:58 +0400 From: Stanislav Kinsbursky MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J. Bruce Fields" CC: , , Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: swap fs root in NFSd kthreads References: <20121206153204.30693.11408.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20121206153447.30693.54128.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20121210202842.GB17350@fieldses.org> <50C73C60.8060405@parallels.com> <50C73F58.1080005@parallels.com> <20121211145621.GA3336@fieldses.org> <50C74C14.8030807@parallels.com> <20121211152036.GB3336@fieldses.org> <20121211153527.GC3336@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20121211153527.GC3336@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 11.12.2012 19:35, J. Bruce Fields пишет: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:20:36AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: >>> I don't really understand, how mountd's root can be wrong. I.e. >>> its' always right as I see it. NFSd kthreads have to swap/use >>> relative path/whatever to communicate with proper mountd. >>> Or I'm missing something? >> >> Ugh, I see the problem: I thought svc_export_request was called at the >> time mountd does the read, but instead its done at the time nfsd does >> the upcall. >> >> I suspect that's wrong, and we really want this done in the context of >> the mountd process when it does the read call. If d_path is called >> there then we have no problem. > > Right, so I'd be happier if we could modify sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall to > skip calling cache_request and instead delay that until cache_read(). I > think that should be possible. > So, Bruce, what we going to do (or what you want me to do) with the rest of NFSd changes? I.e. how I should solve this d_path() problem? I.e. I don't understand what did you mean by "I'd be happier if we could modify sunrpc_cache_pipe_upcall to skip calling cache_request and instead delay that until cache_read()". Could you give me a hint? > --b. > -- Best regards, Stanislav Kinsbursky