From: fanchaoting <fanchaoting@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "Peng, Tao" <tao.peng@emc.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pnfs-block: may be return NULL when find a extent
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:55:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <513FCE92.7050105@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1882637210201641A747464075FFC649025986A4@MX101CL02.corp.emc.com>
Peng, Tao 写道:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
>> fanchaoting
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 2:09 PM
>> To: Myklebust, Trond
>> Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: [PATCH] pnfs-block: may be return NULL when find a extent
>>
>> maybe return NULL when find a extent, if we use it later,
>> it will cause oops.
>>
> ah, I would say it is intentional because the lookup cannot fail here. If we are committing an extent but cannot find it in client's extent cache, it certainly is a bug somewhere else. I remember there are other places like this in block layout code as well and we used to put a BUG_ON() there. But since we are using the pointer right away and crash on NULL pointer dereference anyway, it was suggested to remove these BUG_ON()s during code review.
>
Get it , thanks for telling me it.
> Are you fixing this because you saw a crash or because some static code analyzer complains?
>
> Thanks,
> Tao
>
>> Signed-off-by: fanchaoting<fanchaoting@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> fs/nfs/blocklayout/extents.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/extents.c b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/extents.c
>> index 9c3e117..131ea59 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/extents.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/extents.c
>> @@ -762,6 +762,11 @@ set_to_rw(struct pnfs_block_layout *bl, u64 offset, u64 length)
>>
>> spin_lock(&bl->bl_ext_lock);
>> be = bl_find_get_extent_locked(bl, offset);
>> + if (!be) {
>> + spin_unlock(&bl->bl_ext_lock);
>> + goto out_nosplit;
>> + }
>> +
>> rv = be->be_f_offset + be->be_length;
>> if (be->be_state != PNFS_BLOCK_INVALID_DATA) {
>> spin_unlock(&bl->bl_ext_lock);
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-13 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-12 6:09 [PATCH] pnfs-block: may be return NULL when find a extent fanchaoting
2013-03-12 10:27 ` Peng, Tao
2013-03-13 0:55 ` fanchaoting [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=513FCE92.7050105@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=fanchaoting@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tao.peng@emc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).