linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chiluk <dave.chiluk@canonical.com>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFSv4 setattr null-terminates strings
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:57:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5141E551.9060008@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA345DA4F4AE44899BD2B03EEEC2FA9286B6F80@sacexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com>

On 03/08/2013 12:33 PM, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 11:11 -0600, Dave Chiluk wrote:
>> As of commit 57e62324e469e092ecc6c94a7a86fe4bd6ac5172, the SETATTR nfsv4
>> command now null terminates fattr_owner and fattr_owner_group.
>>
>> Here is an example excerpt from a tcpdump
>> Opcode: SETATTR (34)
>>     stateid
>>         [StateID Hash: 0xafa9]
>>         seqid: 0x00000000
>>         Data: 000000000000000000000000
>>     obj_attributes
>>         attrmask
>>             recc_attr: FATTR4_OWNER_GROUP (37)
>>                 fattr4_owner_group: groupname@domainname.com
>>                     length: 25
>>
>> This means that even though there are actually 24 characters in
>> groupname@domainname.com, we now send 24 characters + 1 null character.
>> Hence the total length of 25.  Previously the client would send just the
>> 24 characters and set length to 24.
>>
>> This isn't an issue for communication with other Linux machines, but it
>> is an issue for interaction with AIX machines.  As is discussed here.
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1101292
>>
>> I attempted to read the RFC available here
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5661, but have not been able to find a
>> statement instructing one way or the other.
>>
>> So the question becomes, is it correct for linux to be sending this null
>> terminator when read against the RFC, or is it AIX's responsibility to
>> handle null-terminated strings?
> 
> The client is definitely in error here according to RFC3530. Please
> check if the attached patch fixes the issue for you.
> 
> Cheers
>   Trond
> 

Trond,

This appears to work great.  Can you give me an idea when this will get
pulled into the the linux-nfs tree and eventually the mainline tree?

Dave.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-14 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-08 17:11 NFSv4 setattr null-terminates strings Dave Chiluk
2013-03-08 18:33 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-03-08 21:00   ` Dave Chiluk
2013-03-14 14:57   ` Dave Chiluk [this message]
2013-03-19 16:56   ` Dave Chiluk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5141E551.9060008@canonical.com \
    --to=dave.chiluk@canonical.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).