From: "Dawid Stawiarski" <neeo@xl.wp.pl>
To: linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Performance/stability problems with nfs shares
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:04:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51fb4bf3a9bde1.52024761@wp.pl> (raw)
Hi,
we observe performance issues on Blade Linux NFS clients (Ubuntu 12.04 with kernel 3.8.0-23-generic).
Blade nodes are used in a shared hosting environment, and NFS is used to access client's data from Nexenta Storage (mostly small php files and/or images). Single node is running about 300-400 apache instances.
We use 10G on the whole path from nodes to storage with jumbo frames enabled. We didn't see any drops on
network interfaces (on nodes nor switches).
Once in a while, apache processes accesing data on NFS share stuck on IO (D state - stack trace below).
We've already tried different combinations of mount options and tuning sysctls and sunrpc module (we also tried NFSv4 and UDP transport - these only made things worse; without the local locks we had also lots of problems).
Hangs seems to happen under haeavy concurent operations (in production env); unfortunatelly we didn't manage
to reproduce it with benchmark utilities. When the number of nodes is decreased the problem happens more frequently (in this case we have about 600 apache instances per node). We didn't see any problems on the storage itself when one of the shares hangs (the cpu usage and load look as usual).
1. client mount options we've tested:
noatime,nodiratime,noacl,nodev,nosuid,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,intr,bg,timeo=20,nfsvers=3,nolock
noatime,nodiratime,noacl,nodev,nosuid,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,intr,bg,acregmin=6,timeo=20,nfsvers=3,nolock
noatime,nodiratime,noacl,nodev,nosuid,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,intr,bg,acregmin=6,timeo=20,nfsvers=3,nolock
noatime,nodiratime,noacl,nodev,nosuid,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,intr,bg,acregmin=10,timeo=100,nfsvers=3,nolock
noatime,nodiratime,noacl,nodev,nosuid,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,intr,bg,acregmin=10,timeo=600,nfsvers=3,nolock
noatime,nodiratime,noacl,nodev,nosuid,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,intr,bg,acregmin=10,timeo=20,nfsvers=4,nolock
2. linux sysctl:
net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps = 0
net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 30000
net.ipv4.tcp_mtu_probing = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_slow_start_after_idle = 0
net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps = 0
3. linux module option:
options sunrpc tcp_slot_table_entries=128
With nfs timeout=2s we observed a huge loadavg (1000 or more) and lots of processes in "D" state waiting in
function "rpc_bit_killable". Everything "worked" but insanely slow. For example `find` on the mountpoint printed ~1 line per second. "avg RTT" and "avg exe" stats from nfsiostat increased to 500-800ms.
At first, we had 8 mounts from a single storage server (so basicly only one TCP connection was used).
However, we've also tried to add 8 virtual IPs to the storage, and use a separate IP to connect to
every share to distribute traffic among more TCP connections. At the same time we've
set nfs client timeout to 60s (the default). In this case we observed permanent hang
on random (single) mountpoint - and loadavg of about 150. Other mountpoints from the same storage worked correctly. There was no data traffic to hung mountpoint IP; only couple retransmissions (every 60 secs). After TCP reset and reconnect (this happens after couple minutes) everything starts to work correctly.
Now we decreased timeout to 10s.
/proc/PID/stack of a hung process (we have hundreds of these):
[<ffffffffa00eb019>] rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x39/0x90 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa00ec0fb>] __rpc_execute+0x15b/0x1b0 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa00ec87f>] rpc_execute+0x4f/0xb0 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa00e45a5>] rpc_run_task+0x75/0x90 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa00e46c3>] rpc_call_sync+0x43/0xa0 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa02595eb>] nfs3_rpc_wrapper.constprop.10+0x6b/0xb0 [nfsv3]
[<ffffffffa025a4ae>] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x3e/0x50 [nfsv3]
[<ffffffffa01452fd>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0x8d/0x120 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0141313>] nfs_lookup_revalidate+0x353/0x3a0 [nfs]
[<ffffffff811a79b3>] lookup_fast+0x173/0x230
[<ffffffff811a7cc6>] do_last+0x106/0x820
[<ffffffff811aa333>] path_openat+0xb3/0x4d0
[<ffffffff811ab152>] do_filp_open+0x42/0xa0
[<ffffffff8119adaa>] do_sys_open+0xfa/0x250
[<ffffffff811ed8cb>] compat_sys_open+0x1b/0x20
[<ffffffff816fc62c>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x21
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
nfsiostat on a problematic "slow" share (other shares from the SAME storage, but on separate TCP connection work correctly):
10.254.38.115:/volumes/DATA1/10/5 mounted on /home/10/5:
op/s rpc bklog
420.50 0.00
read: ops/s kB/s kB/op retrans avg RTT (ms) avg exe (ms)
1.000 30.736 30.736 0 (0.0%) 13.500 867.700
write: ops/s kB/s kB/op retrans avg RTT (ms) avg exe (ms)
0.600 0.522 0.870 0 (0.0%) 0.667 872.333
mount options used on node:
10.254.38.115:/volumes/DATA1/10/5 /home/10/5 nfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,nodiratime,vers=3,rsize=131072,wsize=131072,namlen=255,acregmin=10,hard,nolock,noacl,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=10.254.38.115,mountvers=3,mountport=63856,mountproto=udp,local_lock=all,addr=10.254.38.115 0 0
netstat:
- very slow access:
tcp 0 0 10.254.39.72:692 10.254.38.115:2049 ESTABLISHED - off (0.00/0/0)
- completly not responding:
tcp 0 132902 10.254.39.74:719 10.254.38.115:2049 ESTABLISHED - on (43.21/3/0)
client software:
- util-linux 2.20.1-1ubuntu3
- nfs-common 1.2.5-3ubuntu3.1
- libevent 2.0.16-stable-1
Can anyone help us to investigate the problem or has any sugestions what to try/check? Any help would be appreciated.
cheers,
Dawid
next reply other threads:[~2013-08-02 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-02 6:04 Dawid Stawiarski [this message]
2013-08-02 13:12 ` Performance/stability problems with nfs shares Jeff Layton
2013-08-02 14:37 ` Dawid Stawiarski
2013-08-02 15:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-08-04 7:29 ` Dawid Stawiarski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51fb4bf3a9bde1.52024761@wp.pl \
--to=neeo@xl.wp.pl \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).