From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@primarydata.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: bfields@redhat.com, NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nfs4_file usage
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:48:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525E8B38.20602@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131016123315.GA29454@infradead.org>
On 2013-10-16 15:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 03:18:21PM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> The nfs4.1 layout stateid is like any other stateid (open/lock/deleg)
>> but it's life time is a bit different as it is not descending from the
>> open stateid (though the protocol requires the client to use it
>> to acquire the first layout for the file) and it is released via
>> either LAYOUTRETURN or CLOSE (in the "return_on_close" case).
>> The rules here are different enough from open/lock/deleg stateids that
>> pnfsd needs special code to handle the management of the actual layout state
>> under the layout stateid and manipulate it accordingly.
>
> I'm not primarily ocnfused about the protocol even if that isn't all
> that clear either. I'm more worried about the code in and around
> nfs4_find_create_layout_stateid. I have looked a bit deeper into it
> and I think the main problem is that struct nfs4_stid isn't refcounted
> by itself, which really confused me expecting nfsd4_lookup_stateid
> to return a reference to it.
>
True. That is likely to change with the state lock elimination project
where a stateid would get refcounted once found and its pointer is returned to
the caller.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20131015211445.GA23636@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <525DB943.3010707@primarydata.com>
[not found] ` <20131016064243.GA28758@infradead.org>
2013-10-16 8:21 ` state lock elimination Benny Halevy
2013-10-16 18:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <525E2C5C.4020104@primarydata.com>
[not found] ` <20131016064649.GB28758@infradead.org>
2013-10-16 8:45 ` nfs4_file usage Benny Halevy
2013-10-16 8:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-16 12:18 ` Benny Halevy
2013-10-16 12:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-16 12:48 ` Benny Halevy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525E8B38.20602@primarydata.com \
--to=bhalevy@primarydata.com \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).