linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@primarydata.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: bfields@redhat.com, NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nfs4_file usage
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:48:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <525E8B38.20602@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131016123315.GA29454@infradead.org>

On 2013-10-16 15:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 03:18:21PM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> The nfs4.1 layout stateid is like any other stateid (open/lock/deleg)
>> but it's life time is a bit different as it is not descending from the
>> open stateid (though the protocol requires the client to use it
>> to acquire the first layout for the file) and it is released via
>> either LAYOUTRETURN or CLOSE (in the "return_on_close" case).
>> The rules here are different enough from open/lock/deleg stateids that
>> pnfsd needs special code to handle the management of the actual layout state
>> under the layout stateid and manipulate it accordingly.
> 
> I'm not primarily ocnfused about the protocol even if that isn't all
> that clear either.  I'm more worried about the code in and around
> nfs4_find_create_layout_stateid.  I have looked a bit deeper into it
> and I think the main problem is that struct nfs4_stid isn't refcounted
> by itself, which really confused me expecting nfsd4_lookup_stateid
> to return a reference to it.
> 

True.  That is likely to change with the state lock elimination project
where a stateid would get refcounted once found and its pointer is returned to
the caller.

      reply	other threads:[~2013-10-16 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20131015211445.GA23636@infradead.org>
     [not found] ` <525DB943.3010707@primarydata.com>
     [not found]   ` <20131016064243.GA28758@infradead.org>
2013-10-16  8:21     ` state lock elimination Benny Halevy
2013-10-16 18:22       ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found] ` <525E2C5C.4020104@primarydata.com>
     [not found]   ` <20131016064649.GB28758@infradead.org>
2013-10-16  8:45     ` nfs4_file usage Benny Halevy
2013-10-16  8:51       ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-16 12:18         ` Benny Halevy
2013-10-16 12:33           ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-16 12:48             ` Benny Halevy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=525E8B38.20602@primarydata.com \
    --to=bhalevy@primarydata.com \
    --cc=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).