From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@primarydata.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: bfields@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] nfsd4: fix recall_lock use in unhash_delegation
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:02:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52711187.10202@primarydata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131029144658.GR31322@fieldses.org>
On 2013-10-29 16:46, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:39:04AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> Access to dp->dl_perclnt must be synchronized by the recall_lock
>
> Are you sure? recall_lock is for stuff that's needed in the delegation
> break callback (nfsd_break_deleg_cb() and any of the subsequent callback
> handling). I don't think that includes dl_perclnt.
I was mislead by the fact that destroy_client and nfs4_state_shutdown_net
care to acquire the recall_lock for traversing the clp->cl_delegations
and nn->del_recall_lru lists, respectively.
Now nfs4_state_shutdown_net, although its comment says it should be
called with the state lock held (SHOULD or should, or should it be MUST? :)
It doesn't seem like nfsd_shutdown_net acquires the state lock.
Therefore, we either need to grab the state lock in nfs4_state_shutdown_net
which adds yet another problem to fix, or access dl_perclnt always under the
spin lock.
Benny
>
> --b.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@primarydata.com>
>> ---
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> index a90949a..a403502 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> @@ -436,8 +436,8 @@ static void unhash_stid(struct nfs4_stid *s)
>> static void
>> unhash_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
>> {
>> - list_del_init(&dp->dl_perclnt);
>> spin_lock(&recall_lock);
>> + list_del_init(&dp->dl_perclnt);
>> list_del_init(&dp->dl_perfile);
>> list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
>> spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-30 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-29 9:37 [PATCH 0/7] delegation state fixes and cleanups for 3.13 Benny Halevy
2013-10-29 9:39 ` [PATCH 1/7] nfsd4: fix recall_lock use in unhash_delegation Benny Halevy
2013-10-29 14:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-10-30 14:02 ` Benny Halevy [this message]
2013-10-30 14:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-10-30 14:43 ` Benny Halevy
2013-10-30 22:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-10-29 9:39 ` [PATCH 2/7] nfsd4: need to destroy revoked delegations in destroy_client Benny Halevy
2013-10-29 15:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-10-29 16:02 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-10-30 14:07 ` Benny Halevy
2013-10-29 9:39 ` [PATCH 3/7] nfsd4: properly hash delegation in nfs4_setlease Benny Halevy
2013-10-29 9:39 ` [PATCH 4/7] nfsd4: hash deleg stateid only on successful nfs4_set_delegation Benny Halevy
2013-10-29 15:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-10-30 14:10 ` Benny Halevy
2013-10-29 9:39 ` [PATCH 5/7] nfsd4: cleanup hash and unhash delegation Benny Halevy
2013-10-29 9:39 ` [PATCH 6/7] nfsd4: move nfs4_put_file from unhash to put delegation Benny Halevy
2013-10-29 15:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-10-30 14:16 ` Benny Halevy
2013-10-29 9:39 ` [PATCH 7/7] nfsd4: hold recall_lock while accessing nfs4_delegation.dl_recall_lru Benny Halevy
2013-10-29 16:06 ` [PATCH 0/7] delegation state fixes and cleanups for 3.13 J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52711187.10202@primarydata.com \
--to=bhalevy@primarydata.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).