linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-parisc <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.12-rcX - NFS regression - kswapd0 / kswapd1 stays using 100% CPU?
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:45:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5272B372.8040307@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5262CF20.20301@gmx.de>

On 10/19/2013 08:27 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 10:12 PM, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 22:03 m, Helge Deller wrote:
>>> On 10/18/2013 09:36 PM, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
>>>> Also, could you please try a sysRQ-t the next time it happens, so that
>>>> we can get a trace of where the mount program is hanging. Knowing that
>>>> the mount is stuck in "__schedule()" is not really interesting unless we
>>>> know from where that was called.
>>>
>>> Actually, the machine was still running in this state.
>>> Here is sysrq-t:
>>> [112009.084000] mount           S 00000000401040c0     0 25331      1 0x00000010
>>> [112009.084000] Backtrace:
>>> [112009.084000]  [<0000000040113a68>] __schedule
>>> [112009.232000]
>>> [112009.232000] mount.nfs       D 00000000401040c0     0 25332  25331 0x00000010
>>> [112009.232000] Backtrace:
>>> [112009.232000]  [<0000000040113a68>] __schedule
>>
>> That makes no sense unless sysrq-t works differently on parisc than on
>> other platforms. I'd expect the backtrace to at least include a system
>> call. Parisc experts?
> 
> sysrq-t doesn't work differently on parisc. For other processes I do get
> a backtrace like the one on x86_64.
> That's the main reason why I asked for ideas here on the list.
> I do see the stuck process, but don't see any indications where it comes from.

I'm pretty sure that the regression (kswapd using 100% CPU) I reported here is fixed by this patch:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git/commit/?id=c56b097af26cb11c1f49a4311ba538c825666fed

I will start some testing...

Helge

      reply	other threads:[~2013-10-31 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-17 20:42 3.12-rcX - NFS regression - kswapd0 / kswapd1 stays using 100% CPU? Helge Deller
2013-10-17 21:07 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-10-18 19:26   ` Helge Deller
2013-10-18 19:36     ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-10-18 20:03       ` Helge Deller
2013-10-18 20:12         ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-10-19 18:27           ` Helge Deller
2013-10-31 19:45             ` Helge Deller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5272B372.8040307@gmx.de \
    --to=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).