From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>, trond.myklebust@netapp.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sunrpc: more reliable detection of running gssd
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:21:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52824784.4080901@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384261225-28559-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
On 12/11/13 08:00, Jeff Layton wrote:
> We've gotten a lot of complaints recently about the 15s delay when
> doing a sec=sys mount without gssd running.
>
> A large part of the problem is that the kernel isn't able to reliably
> detect when rpc.gssd is running. What we currently have is a
> gssd_running flag that is initially set to 1. When an upcall times out,
> that gets set to 0, and subsequent upcalls get a much shorter timeout
> (1/4s instead of 15s). It's reset back to '1' when a pipe is reopened.
>
> The approach of using a flag like this is pretty inadequate. First, it
> doesn't eliminate the long delay on the initial upcall attempt. Also,
> if gssd spontaneously dies, then the flag will still be set to 1 until
> the next upcall attempt times out. Finally, it currently requires that
> the pipe be reopened in order to reset the flag back to true.
>
> This patchset replaces that flag with a more reliable mechanism for
> detecting when gssd is running. When rpc_pipefs is mounted, it creates a
> new "dummy" pipe that gssd will naturally find and hold open. We'll
> never send an upcall down this pipe, and writing to it always fails.
> But, since we can detect when something is holding it open, we can use
> that to determine whether gssd is running.
>
> The current patch just uses this mechanism to replace the gssd_running
> flag with this new mechanism. This shortens the long delay when mounting
> without gssd running, but does not silence these warnings:
>
> RPC: AUTH_GSS upcall timed out.
> Please check user daemon is running.
>
> I'm willing to add a patch to do that, but I'm a little unclear on the
> best way to do so. Those messages are generated by the auth_gss code. We
> probably do want to print them if someone mounted with sec=krb5, but
> suppress them when mounting with sec=sys.
>
> Do we need to somehow pass down that intent to auth_gss? Another idea
> would be to call gssd_running() from the nfs mount code and use that to
> determine whether to try and use krb5 at all...
>
> Discuss!
I've just verified that a mount, with these patches, takes about
1.2 seconds when rpc.gssd is not running.... With rpc.gssd it
take about .2 seconds.
Tested-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
steved.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-12 13:00 [PATCH 0/2] sunrpc: more reliable detection of running gssd Jeff Layton
2013-11-12 13:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] sunrpc: create a new dummy pipe for gssd to hold open Jeff Layton
2013-11-12 17:36 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-11-12 17:44 ` Jeff Layton
2013-11-12 17:56 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-11-12 13:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] sunrpc: replace sunrpc_net->gssd_running flag with a better mechanism Jeff Layton
2013-11-12 15:21 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2013-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH 0/2] sunrpc: more reliable detection of running gssd NeilBrown
2013-11-12 22:37 ` Jeff Layton
2013-11-12 16:02 ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-12 16:08 ` Jeff Layton
2013-11-12 16:15 ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-12 16:56 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-11-12 17:12 ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-12 17:13 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52824784.4080901@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).