From: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: vasily.isaenko@oracle.com, hch@infradead.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
sprabhu@redhat.com, bfields@fieldses.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: revoking of suid/sgid bits after chown() in a consistent way
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:00:22 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A845C6.2080109@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386756996-28083-1-git-send-email-stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
On 12/11/2013 02:16 PM, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote:
[cut off]
>
> This patch makes NFS to behave like local file systems.
>
[cut off]
This patch allows to run generic/193 without any issues with NFSv3.
With NFSv4 generic/193 fails (but with the other issues, which existed
even before the patch).
generic/193 expects that suid/sgid bits are cleared after the file
truncation:
touch file
chown fsgqa:fsgqa file
chmod u+s file
echo 'xyz' > file
ls -l file
su fsgqa -c 'echo > file'
ls -l file
With ext4 (for example), we have expectable results:
-rwSr--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 4 Dec 11 05:21 file
-rw-r--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 1 Dec 11 05:22 file
With NFSv3 as well:
-rwSr--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 4 Dec 11 05:24 file
-rw-r--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 1 Dec 11 05:25 file
But with NFSv4 the bits are not cleared:
-rwSr--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 1 Dec 11 05:19 file
-rwSr--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 1 Dec 11 05:21 file
'echo > file' issues:
open("file", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666)
Can it be because of design differences between NFSv3 and NFSv4?
Thank you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-11 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-06 11:56 nfs vs xfstests 193 Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 13:20 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-06 18:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 20:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-12-06 20:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-12-10 14:43 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-11 10:16 ` [PATCH] nfsd: revoking of suid/sgid bits after chown() in a consistent way Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-11 11:00 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh [this message]
2013-12-12 3:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-12-12 8:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 11:44 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-12 16:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A845C6.2080109@oracle.com \
--to=stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sprabhu@redhat.com \
--cc=vasily.isaenko@oracle.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).