From: Anna Schumaker <schumaker.anna@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nfs: remove ->write_pageio_init from rpc ops
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:04:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53288AAC.2010406@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140318140942.GB11672@infradead.org>
On 03/18/2014 10:09 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> + struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(inode);
>>> + const struct nfs_pageio_ops *pg_ops = &nfs_pageio_write_ops;
>>> +
>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NFS_V4)
>>> + if (server->pnfs_curr_ld)
>>> + pg_ops = server->pnfs_curr_ld->pg_write_ops;
>>> +#endif
>>> + nfs_pageio_init(pgio, inode, pg_ops, compl_ops, server->wsize, ioflags);
>>> }
>> I thought it was bad style to put a #ifdef in the middle of a function, which is why we have so many noop functions in the rest of the code. Should this be done with a select_compl_ops() function instead?
> I don't think it's much of a problem for a small and readable function
> with a single ifdef. And we'd need one helper for read and write each,
> which would make the code much harder to read. Still better than what's
> there currently, though.
>
> The other option would be to simply always have the pnfs_curr_ld field
> in the server structure and remove the ifdef entirely.
Okay. If we keep the ifdef, then it should probably check for CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 and not CONFIG_NFS_V4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-18 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-18 11:28 [PATCH 1/2] nfs: remove ->write_pageio_init from rpc ops Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-18 11:28 ` [PATHC 2/2] nfs: remove ->read_pageio_init " Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfs: remove ->write_pageio_init " Anna Schumaker
2014-03-18 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-18 18:04 ` Anna Schumaker [this message]
2014-03-19 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-19 13:11 ` Anna Schumaker
2014-03-19 15:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-16 13:07 pageio_init simplifications, V2 Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-16 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfs: remove ->write_pageio_init from rpc ops Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-17 14:50 ` Anna Schumaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53288AAC.2010406@gmail.com \
--to=schumaker.anna@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).