From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9222 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753611AbaIXPay (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:30:54 -0400 Message-ID: <5422E3A8.4050506@RedHat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:30:48 -0400 From: Steve Dickson MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J. Bruce Fields" CC: NeilBrown , Simo Sorce , Linux NFS Mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nfs-service: Added the starting of gssproxy References: <5420B78D.6040704@RedHat.com> <20140922202655.5e308e58@willson.usersys.redhat.com> <20140923015549.GB32712@fieldses.org> <20140923120804.51dbcc2e@notabene.brown> <20140923021110.GB1409@fieldses.org> <20140923192311.GI29932@fieldses.org> <5421D55B.8040403@RedHat.com> <20140923202514.GO29932@fieldses.org> <5421E2E6.7000409@RedHat.com> <5422DE24.9050608@RedHat.com> <20140924152333.GB3365@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20140924152333.GB3365@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/24/2014 11:23 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:07:16AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >> On 09/23/2014 05:15 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >>> >>> On 09/23/2014 04:25 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>>>> I through this into my test world >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>>>> and one side effect of this patch >>>>>> is both rpc.gssd and rpc.svcgssd daemons are *always* started when >>>>>> a key tab exists (/etc/krb5.keytab) and *all* the services (nfs-client, >>>>>> nfs-server, rpc-gssd, and rpc-svcgssd) are disabled, which is not >>>>>> good... Those daemons don't need to be started when both sides >>>>>> are disabled... But the auth_rpcgss is loaded! ;-) >>>> Weird. I can't see how this patch on its own would have any effect on >>>> that. >> It turns out I must have had the nfs-client.target enabled... >> >> I just realize 'systemctl disable nfs-client' does not fail, >> but it does not do anything either. :-( I would think >> it should fail with some type of "unit not found", but it >> does not... > > Huh, yes, that seems kind of unhelpful. > > # systemctl disable dighdfdij > # echo $? > 0 yup... that's what bit me in the original testing... The wonderful world of systemd!!! :-P Your patch has been committed... steved