public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd4: fix response size estimation for OP_SEQUENCE
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:33:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54480679.70501@Netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141022192258.GB5552@fieldses.org>

On 10/22/14 15:22, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 09:14:06AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> Also my tests are failing due to an unrelated crash in 18-rc1 which I
>> want to track down before sending this in.
> 
> There are two bugs:
> 
> 	- the client is sending SEEK over minorversion 1.
> 	- this sometimes causes the server to crash.
> 
> I'm testing a fix for the latter.
> 
> On the former: looks like if 4.2 support is built in, then llseek is set
> to nfs4_file_llseek, which unconditionally calls nfs42_proc_llseek().
> 
> Does nfs4_file_llseek need an explicit minorversion check, or should it
> be handled some other way?

The client should be checking for CAP_SEEK, which should only be set on NFS v4.2.  I'll look into this!
> 
> --b.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-22 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-17 21:24 [PATCH] nfsd4: fix response size estimation for OP_SEQUENCE J. Bruce Fields
2014-10-21 10:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-21 13:14   ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-10-22 19:22     ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-10-22 19:33       ` Anna Schumaker [this message]
2014-10-22 19:42       ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-10-22 20:12         ` Tom Haynes
2014-10-23  7:34           ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-22 19:49       ` [PATCH] nfsd4: fix crash on unknown operation number J. Bruce Fields
2014-10-23 11:54     ` [PATCH] nfsd4: fix response size estimation for OP_SEQUENCE Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54480679.70501@Netapp.com \
    --to=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox