From: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/20] xprtrdma: Move credit update to RPC reply handler
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 12:49:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AEC312.2040807@Netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FCFC2C87-4723-4E57-B1C1-A9F340D93914@oracle.com>
On 01/08/2015 11:10 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Chuck,
>>
>> On 01/07/2015 06:12 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> Reduce work in the receive CQ handler, which is run at hardware
>>> interrupt level, by moving the RPC/RDMA credit update logic to the
>>> RPC reply handler.
>>>
>>> This has some additional benefits: More header sanity checking is
>>> done before trusting the incoming credit value, and the receive CQ
>>> handler no longer touches the RPC/RDMA header. Finally, no longer
>>> any need to update and read rb_credits atomically, so the rb_credits
>>> field can be removed.
>>>
>>> This further extends work begun by commit e7ce710a8802 ("xprtrdma:
>>> Avoid deadlock when credit window is reset").
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c | 10 ++++++++--
>>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c | 15 ++-------------
>>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h | 1 -
>>> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
>>> index dcf5ebc..d731010 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
>>> @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ rpcrdma_reply_handler(struct rpcrdma_rep *rep)
>>> struct rpc_xprt *xprt = rep->rr_xprt;
>>> struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = rpcx_to_rdmax(xprt);
>>> __be32 *iptr;
>>> - int rdmalen, status;
>>> + int credits, rdmalen, status;
>>> unsigned long cwnd;
>>>
>>> /* Check status. If bad, signal disconnect and return rep to pool */
>>> @@ -871,8 +871,14 @@ badheader:
>>> break;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + credits = be32_to_cpu(headerp->rm_credit);
>>> + if (credits == 0)
>>> + credits = 1; /* don't deadlock */
>>> + else if (credits > r_xprt->rx_buf.rb_max_requests)
>>> + credits = r_xprt->rx_buf.rb_max_requests;
>>
>> Can rb_max_requests ever drop to 0?
>
> rb_max_requests is set at mount time to xprt_rdma_slot_table_entries.
> rb_max_requests is not changed again.
>
> xprt_rdma_slot_table_entries is set to a compile-time constant,
> but can be changed via a /proc file setting. The lower and upper
> bounds are min_slot_table_size and max_slot_table_size, both set
> to compile-time constants.
>
> IMO there�s no practical danger rb_max_requests will ever be zero
> unless someone makes a coding mistake.
>
> Did you want me to reverse the order of the if conditions as a
> defensive coding measure?
If there is no practical danger then it's probably fine the way it is. Thanks for double checking!
Anna
>
>
>> Anna
>>
>>> +
>>> cwnd = xprt->cwnd;
>>> - xprt->cwnd = atomic_read(&r_xprt->rx_buf.rb_credits) << RPC_CWNDSHIFT;
>>> + xprt->cwnd = credits << RPC_CWNDSHIFT;
>>> if (xprt->cwnd > cwnd)
>>> xprt_release_rqst_cong(rqst->rq_task);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
>>> index 1000f63..71a071a 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
>>> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
>>>
>>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>>> +#include <linux/prefetch.h>
>>> #include <asm/bitops.h>
>>>
>>> #include "xprt_rdma.h"
>>> @@ -298,17 +299,7 @@ rpcrdma_recvcq_process_wc(struct ib_wc *wc, struct list_head *sched_list)
>>> rep->rr_len = wc->byte_len;
>>> ib_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(rdmab_to_ia(rep->rr_buffer)->ri_id->device,
>>> rep->rr_iov.addr, rep->rr_len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>>> -
>>> - if (rep->rr_len >= 16) {
>>> - struct rpcrdma_msg *p = (struct rpcrdma_msg *)rep->rr_base;
>>> - unsigned int credits = ntohl(p->rm_credit);
>>> -
>>> - if (credits == 0)
>>> - credits = 1; /* don't deadlock */
>>> - else if (credits > rep->rr_buffer->rb_max_requests)
>>> - credits = rep->rr_buffer->rb_max_requests;
>>> - atomic_set(&rep->rr_buffer->rb_credits, credits);
>>> - }
>>> + prefetch(rep->rr_base);
>>>
>>> out_schedule:
>>> list_add_tail(&rep->rr_list, sched_list);
>>> @@ -480,7 +471,6 @@ rpcrdma_conn_upcall(struct rdma_cm_id *id, struct rdma_cm_event *event)
>>> case RDMA_CM_EVENT_DEVICE_REMOVAL:
>>> connstate = -ENODEV;
>>> connected:
>>> - atomic_set(&rpcx_to_rdmax(ep->rep_xprt)->rx_buf.rb_credits, 1);
>>> dprintk("RPC: %s: %sconnected\n",
>>> __func__, connstate > 0 ? "" : "dis");
>>> ep->rep_connected = connstate;
>>> @@ -1186,7 +1176,6 @@ rpcrdma_buffer_create(struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf, struct rpcrdma_ep *ep,
>>>
>>> buf->rb_max_requests = cdata->max_requests;
>>> spin_lock_init(&buf->rb_lock);
>>> - atomic_set(&buf->rb_credits, 1);
>>>
>>> /* Need to allocate:
>>> * 1. arrays for send and recv pointers
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
>>> index 532d586..3fcc92b 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
>>> @@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ struct rpcrdma_req {
>>> */
>>> struct rpcrdma_buffer {
>>> spinlock_t rb_lock; /* protects indexes */
>>> - atomic_t rb_credits; /* most recent server credits */
>>> int rb_max_requests;/* client max requests */
>>> struct list_head rb_mws; /* optional memory windows/fmrs/frmrs */
>>> struct list_head rb_all;
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
> chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-08 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-07 23:11 [PATCH v1 00/20] NFS/RDMA client for 3.20 Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:11 ` [PATCH v1 01/20] xprtrdma: human-readable completion status Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 02/20] xprtrdma: Modernize htonl and ntohl Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 03/20] xprtrdma: Display XIDs in host byte order Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 04/20] xprtrdma: Clean up hdrlen Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 05/20] xprtrdma: Rename "xprt" and "rdma_connect" fields in struct rpcrdma_xprt Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 06/20] xprtrdma: Remove rpcrdma_ep::rep_ia Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 07/20] xprtrdma: Remove rl_mr field, and the mr_chunk union Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 08/20] xprtrdma: Move credit update to RPC reply handler Chuck Lever
2015-01-08 15:53 ` Anna Schumaker
2015-01-08 16:10 ` Chuck Lever
2015-01-08 17:49 ` Anna Schumaker [this message]
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 09/20] xprtrdma: Remove rpcrdma_ep::rep_func and ::rep_xprt Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 10/20] xprtrdma: Free the pd if ib_query_qp() fails Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 11/20] xprtrdma: Take struct ib_device_attr off the stack Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 12/20] xprtrdma: Take struct ib_qp_attr and ib_qp_init_attr " Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 13/20] xprtrdma: Simplify synopsis of rpcrdma_buffer_create() Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 14/20] xprtrdma: Refactor rpcrdma_buffer_create() and rpcrdma_buffer_destroy() Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 15/20] xprtrdma: Add struct rpcrdma_regbuf and helpers Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 16/20] xprtrdma: Allocate RPC send buffer separately from struct rpcrdma_req Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:14 ` [PATCH v1 17/20] xprtrdma: Allocate RDMA/RPC " Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:14 ` [PATCH v1 18/20] xprtrdma: Allocate RPC/RDMA receive buffer separately from struct rpcrdma_rep Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:14 ` [PATCH v1 19/20] xprtrdma: Allocate zero pad separately from rpcrdma_buffer Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:14 ` [PATCH v1 20/20] xprtrdma: Clean up after adding regbuf management Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54AEC312.2040807@Netapp.com \
--to=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox