Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/20] xprtrdma: Move credit update to RPC reply handler
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 12:49:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AEC312.2040807@Netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FCFC2C87-4723-4E57-B1C1-A9F340D93914@oracle.com>

On 01/08/2015 11:10 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> 
> On Jan 8, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hey Chuck,
>>
>> On 01/07/2015 06:12 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> Reduce work in the receive CQ handler, which is run at hardware
>>> interrupt level, by moving the RPC/RDMA credit update logic to the
>>> RPC reply handler.
>>>
>>> This has some additional benefits: More header sanity checking is
>>> done before trusting the incoming credit value, and the receive CQ
>>> handler no longer touches the RPC/RDMA header. Finally, no longer
>>> any need to update and read rb_credits atomically, so the rb_credits
>>> field can be removed.
>>>
>>> This further extends work begun by commit e7ce710a8802 ("xprtrdma:
>>> Avoid deadlock when credit window is reset").
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c  |   10 ++++++++--
>>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c     |   15 ++-------------
>>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h |    1 -
>>> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
>>> index dcf5ebc..d731010 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
>>> @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ rpcrdma_reply_handler(struct rpcrdma_rep *rep)
>>> 	struct rpc_xprt *xprt = rep->rr_xprt;
>>> 	struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = rpcx_to_rdmax(xprt);
>>> 	__be32 *iptr;
>>> -	int rdmalen, status;
>>> +	int credits, rdmalen, status;
>>> 	unsigned long cwnd;
>>>
>>> 	/* Check status. If bad, signal disconnect and return rep to pool */
>>> @@ -871,8 +871,14 @@ badheader:
>>> 		break;
>>> 	}
>>>
>>> +	credits = be32_to_cpu(headerp->rm_credit);
>>> +	if (credits == 0)
>>> +		credits = 1;	/* don't deadlock */
>>> +	else if (credits > r_xprt->rx_buf.rb_max_requests)
>>> +		credits = r_xprt->rx_buf.rb_max_requests;
>>
>> Can rb_max_requests ever drop to 0?
> 
> rb_max_requests is set at mount time to xprt_rdma_slot_table_entries.
> rb_max_requests is not changed again.
> 
> xprt_rdma_slot_table_entries is set to a compile-time constant,
> but can be changed via a /proc file setting. The lower and upper
> bounds are min_slot_table_size and max_slot_table_size, both set
> to compile-time constants.
> 
> IMO there�s no practical danger rb_max_requests will ever be zero
> unless someone makes a coding mistake.
> 
> Did you want me to reverse the order of the if conditions as a
> defensive coding measure?

If there is no practical danger then it's probably fine the way it is.  Thanks for double checking!

Anna
> 
> 
>> Anna
>>
>>> +
>>> 	cwnd = xprt->cwnd;
>>> -	xprt->cwnd = atomic_read(&r_xprt->rx_buf.rb_credits) << RPC_CWNDSHIFT;
>>> +	xprt->cwnd = credits << RPC_CWNDSHIFT;
>>> 	if (xprt->cwnd > cwnd)
>>> 		xprt_release_rqst_cong(rqst->rq_task);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
>>> index 1000f63..71a071a 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
>>> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
>>>
>>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>>> +#include <linux/prefetch.h>
>>> #include <asm/bitops.h>
>>>
>>> #include "xprt_rdma.h"
>>> @@ -298,17 +299,7 @@ rpcrdma_recvcq_process_wc(struct ib_wc *wc, struct list_head *sched_list)
>>> 	rep->rr_len = wc->byte_len;
>>> 	ib_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(rdmab_to_ia(rep->rr_buffer)->ri_id->device,
>>> 			rep->rr_iov.addr, rep->rr_len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>>> -
>>> -	if (rep->rr_len >= 16) {
>>> -		struct rpcrdma_msg *p = (struct rpcrdma_msg *)rep->rr_base;
>>> -		unsigned int credits = ntohl(p->rm_credit);
>>> -
>>> -		if (credits == 0)
>>> -			credits = 1;	/* don't deadlock */
>>> -		else if (credits > rep->rr_buffer->rb_max_requests)
>>> -			credits = rep->rr_buffer->rb_max_requests;
>>> -		atomic_set(&rep->rr_buffer->rb_credits, credits);
>>> -	}
>>> +	prefetch(rep->rr_base);
>>>
>>> out_schedule:
>>> 	list_add_tail(&rep->rr_list, sched_list);
>>> @@ -480,7 +471,6 @@ rpcrdma_conn_upcall(struct rdma_cm_id *id, struct rdma_cm_event *event)
>>> 	case RDMA_CM_EVENT_DEVICE_REMOVAL:
>>> 		connstate = -ENODEV;
>>> connected:
>>> -		atomic_set(&rpcx_to_rdmax(ep->rep_xprt)->rx_buf.rb_credits, 1);
>>> 		dprintk("RPC:       %s: %sconnected\n",
>>> 					__func__, connstate > 0 ? "" : "dis");
>>> 		ep->rep_connected = connstate;
>>> @@ -1186,7 +1176,6 @@ rpcrdma_buffer_create(struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf, struct rpcrdma_ep *ep,
>>>
>>> 	buf->rb_max_requests = cdata->max_requests;
>>> 	spin_lock_init(&buf->rb_lock);
>>> -	atomic_set(&buf->rb_credits, 1);
>>>
>>> 	/* Need to allocate:
>>> 	 *   1.  arrays for send and recv pointers
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
>>> index 532d586..3fcc92b 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
>>> @@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ struct rpcrdma_req {
>>>  */
>>> struct rpcrdma_buffer {
>>> 	spinlock_t	rb_lock;	/* protects indexes */
>>> -	atomic_t	rb_credits;	/* most recent server credits */
>>> 	int		rb_max_requests;/* client max requests */
>>> 	struct list_head rb_mws;	/* optional memory windows/fmrs/frmrs */
>>> 	struct list_head rb_all;
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-08 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-07 23:11 [PATCH v1 00/20] NFS/RDMA client for 3.20 Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:11 ` [PATCH v1 01/20] xprtrdma: human-readable completion status Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 02/20] xprtrdma: Modernize htonl and ntohl Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 03/20] xprtrdma: Display XIDs in host byte order Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 04/20] xprtrdma: Clean up hdrlen Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 05/20] xprtrdma: Rename "xprt" and "rdma_connect" fields in struct rpcrdma_xprt Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 06/20] xprtrdma: Remove rpcrdma_ep::rep_ia Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 07/20] xprtrdma: Remove rl_mr field, and the mr_chunk union Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:12 ` [PATCH v1 08/20] xprtrdma: Move credit update to RPC reply handler Chuck Lever
2015-01-08 15:53   ` Anna Schumaker
2015-01-08 16:10     ` Chuck Lever
2015-01-08 17:49       ` Anna Schumaker [this message]
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 09/20] xprtrdma: Remove rpcrdma_ep::rep_func and ::rep_xprt Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 10/20] xprtrdma: Free the pd if ib_query_qp() fails Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 11/20] xprtrdma: Take struct ib_device_attr off the stack Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 12/20] xprtrdma: Take struct ib_qp_attr and ib_qp_init_attr " Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 13/20] xprtrdma: Simplify synopsis of rpcrdma_buffer_create() Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 14/20] xprtrdma: Refactor rpcrdma_buffer_create() and rpcrdma_buffer_destroy() Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 15/20] xprtrdma: Add struct rpcrdma_regbuf and helpers Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:13 ` [PATCH v1 16/20] xprtrdma: Allocate RPC send buffer separately from struct rpcrdma_req Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:14 ` [PATCH v1 17/20] xprtrdma: Allocate RDMA/RPC " Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:14 ` [PATCH v1 18/20] xprtrdma: Allocate RPC/RDMA receive buffer separately from struct rpcrdma_rep Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:14 ` [PATCH v1 19/20] xprtrdma: Allocate zero pad separately from rpcrdma_buffer Chuck Lever
2015-01-07 23:14 ` [PATCH v1 20/20] xprtrdma: Clean up after adding regbuf management Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54AEC312.2040807@Netapp.com \
    --to=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox