From: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>,
kinglongmee@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] NFSD: fix cannot umounting mount points under pseudo root
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 16:32:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55488006.6050502@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150505141957.2aef920e@notabene.brown>
On 5/5/2015 12:19 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, 05 May 2015 11:53:27 +0800 Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Cc Steve, Viro,
>>
>> On 5/1/2015 5:36 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 07:52:25AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:19:34 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Maybe drop the locking from nfsd_buffered_readdir and *just* take the
>>>>> i_mutex around lookup_one_len(), if that's the only place we need it?
>>
>> As description in other thread, before the upcall to rpc.mountd,
>> nfsd have call lookup_one_len() for the file, but why rpc.mountd
>> also blocked in lookup ?
>>
>> There is a bug in rpc.mountd when checking sub-directory,
>> it sets bad patch length for child.
>>
>> If parent if "/nfs/xfs" and child is "/nfs/test", the child name
>> will be truncated to "/nfs/tes" for strlen(parent), "/nfs/test"
>> have exist in kernel's cache for the lookup_one_len(), but
>> "/nfs/tes" is a bad path, which needs lookup_slow(), so blocked.
>
> Testing for "/nfs/tes" certain seems like a wrong thing to do.
>
>>
>> static int is_subdirectory(char *child, char *parent)
>> {
>> /* Check is child is strictly a subdirectory of
>> * parent or a more distant descendant.
>> */
>> size_t l = strlen(parent);
>>
>> if (strcmp(parent, "/") == 0 && child[1] != 0)
>> return 1;
>>
>> return (same_path(child, parent, l) && child[l] == '/');
>
> I guess this should be:
>
> child[l] == '/' && same_path(child, parent, l)
>
> That way there would be no risk of truncating anything.
>
> Can you please test if that one-line change removes the problem?
Yes, that's OK.
I have think about the "/nfs/nfs" and "/nfs/123" of the first patch,
yes, that's redundant.
>
>> }
>>
>> The following path makes a correct path, not a truncated path.
>> Have be tested, everything is OK.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Kinglong Mee
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >From 70b9d1d93a24db8a7837998cb7eb0ff4e98480a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 11:47:20 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] mountd: Case-insensitive path length must equal to parent
>>
>> Commit 6091c0a4c4 (mountd: add support for case-insensitive file names)
>> introdues a bug cause mutex race when looking bad path.
>
> I think we should be clear that the mutex race is already present.
> I think you are right that there is a bug here which is making it easy to
> trigger, but it isn't exactly "causing" the bug.
Thanks for the comments.
thanks,
Kinglong Mee
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-21 14:50 [PATCH RFC] NFSD: fix cannot umounting mount points under pseudo root Kinglong Mee
2015-04-21 21:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-04-22 5:07 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-22 11:11 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-04-22 15:07 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-04-22 23:44 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-23 12:52 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-04-24 3:00 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-27 12:11 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-04-29 2:57 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-29 8:45 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-04-29 19:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-04-29 21:52 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-30 21:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-01 1:53 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-01 2:03 ` Al Viro
2015-05-01 2:23 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-01 2:29 ` Al Viro
2015-05-01 3:08 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-01 13:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-02 23:16 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-03 0:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-04 4:11 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-04 21:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 22:27 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-04 22:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 13:54 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-05-05 14:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 15:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 22:26 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-08 16:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-08 20:01 ` [PATCH] nfsd: don't hold i_mutex over userspace upcalls J. Bruce Fields
2015-06-03 15:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-07-05 11:27 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-07-06 18:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-08-18 19:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-11-12 21:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-07 15:31 ` [PATCH RFC] NFSD: fix cannot umounting mount points under pseudo root J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-07 22:42 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-08 14:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 3:53 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-05-05 4:19 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-05 8:32 ` Kinglong Mee [this message]
2015-05-05 13:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-06-26 23:14 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-06-26 23:35 ` NeilBrown
2015-07-02 9:42 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-05-01 1:55 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55488006.6050502@gmail.com \
--to=kinglongmee@gmail.com \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).