linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joschi Brauchle <joschi.brauchle@tum.de>
To: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFS Client looping with STALE_STATE_ID error - 100% load on one CPU core
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 20:43:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55490F51.2080508@tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.19.9992.1505051301510.946@planck.local>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3199 bytes --]

Hello Ben,

thanks for the hint. I checked the kernel and it already includes this 
patch, but still gets stuck in this STALE_ID -> RENEW -> STALE_ID loop...

Best regards,
J Brauchle

On 05/05/2015 07:24 PM, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> Hi J Brauchle,
>
> Are you producing this on a kernel that has "8faaa6d Fixing lease renewal"?
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8faaa6d5d48b2015
>
> If not, I think that might be what you need.
>
> Ben
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Joschi Brauchle wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am posting to this list as suggested by Neil F Brown in this OpenSUSE
>> bugzilla: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909634
>>
>>
>> We are mounting user homes and other shares using 'sec=krb' and NFSv4. With
>> kernel 3.16.7+ (includes latest NFS patches, please see BZ link for details)
>> we are seeing 100% CPU core usage by a kernel process on some machine
>> connected to a 'NetApp FAS 3140 with ONTAP 8.1.4P1 7-mode' NFSv3/4 Server. It
>> looks like the problem is triggered when the NFS server is unavailable for a
>> short period of time or was rebooted.
>>
>> Neil F Brown has come to the following conclusion so far:
>> ------------- QUOTE -------------
>> What I see happening here is that a WRITE or LOCK request gets
>> NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID, and then the client sends a "RENEW" request.
>>
>> If the stateid is really stale, that should fail, but it doesn't. So the
>> client assumes everything is OK and keeps sending requests .... which fail
>> with NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID.
>>
>> STALE_STATEID means:
>>
>>        A stateid generated by an earlier server instance was used.
>>
>> which means that the server must have restarted since that stateid was issued.
>>
>> So there seem to be two possible explanations:
>>
>> 1/ The server is lying.  The stateid isn't really 'stale'.  Maybe it is 'bad'.
>> 2/ The client has previously handled a STALE_STATEID error and created a new
>> "client" handle, but hasn't refreshed all of the stateids that it was holding.
>> So it is trying to use old stateid even though it has established a new
>> client.
>>
>> The client code looks OK, though it is sufficiently complex that I cannot be
>> certain.  There are no patches in more recent versions.
>> -------------  END  -------------
>>
>> We have some RPC/NFS debug logs available here:
>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=631962
>> And a wireshark trace here:
>> https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=632104
>>
>>
>> What I cannot do:
>> - Trigger or reproduce the problem reliably. It comes up every once in a
>> while. Around 2-3 times a month on a handful of ~50 machines.
>> - Provide logs from with the latest kernel (because I cannot trigger the
>> problem by any means. Updating all ~50 machines is not an option)
>>
>>
>> What I can do:
>> - Provide logs from or possibly even access to the machine in the 'broken'
>> state for the next couple of days. I will have to reboot it at some time to
>> take the load of the NFS server.
>>
>>
>>
>> I would be grateful for any help or comments.
>>
>> -J Brauchle


[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4917 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2015-05-05 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-23 10:16 NFS Client looping with STALE_STATE_ID error - 100% load on one CPU core Joschi Brauchle
2015-05-05 17:24 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-05-05 18:43   ` Joschi Brauchle [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55490F51.2080508@tum.de \
    --to=joschi.brauchle@tum.de \
    --cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).